View more on these topics

Loosening the lifetime allowance for drawdown clients

Andrew Tully White background 700

As a result of the pension freedoms, more clients are likely to be in drawdown at age 75 and beyond. However, this means a lesser-known tax aspect is going to start having an impact on more people.

The snappily titled Benefit Crystallisation Event 5A comes into play for those still in drawdown at age 75. It measures the growth in the drawdown pot since the member originally entered it. If people take a higher income or get poor investment returns, that growth may be a minimal amount or zero.

However, for those taking little or no income who get a decent investment return, it can be a sizeable amount.

If the client has plenty of lifetime allowance remaining, it may not be a concern. But if people have previously used up most or all their lifetime allowance it could leave them facing a hefty tax charge.

Let’s look at an example. Max went into drawdown in 2007 when the lifetime allowance was £1.6m. He took £300,000 of his £1.2m pension pot as a tax-free lump sum, with the remaining £900,000 invested into drawdown. He used up 75 per cent of his lifetime allowance.

In 2017, Max reaches age 75. He has taken an income of £20,000 a year and achieved investment growth of around 5 per cent a year after charges. His drawdown plan at age 75 is valued at £1.25m. The growth in his pension pot to be measured against the lifetime allowance is £1.25m, less £900,000: £350,000.

Max has 25 per cent of his lifetime allowance still available. The lifetime allowance in 2017 is £1m, which means he has £250,000 left. As the growth is £350,000, this means he exceeds his available lifetime allowance by £100,000.

That excess is subject to the lifetime allowance tax charge, which is 55 per cent if he takes the excess as a lump sum or an immediate 25 per cent if he leaves the excess in the pension wrapper. If he does this, he would also be liable for income tax on any further withdrawals.

For those approaching age 75, planning may help alleviate any tax charge. I have ignored any form of protection in this example but it may be an option for some people. Simply increasing withdrawals is an obvious route, as income tax on the withdrawal may be preferable to 55 per cent tax on any excess.

Altering investment strategy may be another option. Is there a need to take more risk when the majority of any growth will go to the tax man? And if passing on wealth is a key objective, accepting the 25 per cent tax charge to keep funds in the inheritance tax friendly pension may be the best option.

The lifetime allowance check at age 75 has largely been a theoretical concept in the past decade. But over the next few years more people may find it can have a damaging impact. Unless planning starts now.

Andrew Tully is pensions technical director at Retirement Advantage



Govt fires starting gun on future of DB pensions

The Government has set out a range of radical proposals to ensure defined benefit schemes are more sustainable in future. In its green paper on the sustainability of DB pension schemes, published today, the Department for Work and Pensions has kick-started the debate on managing the risks faced by DB pension schemes at the same […]


Royal London: ‘Flexible retirement is an illusion’

Royal London has argued the idea of a “flexible” retirement with a gradual reduction in working hours is unachievable unless increases in pension saving are accelerated. Research by the provider suggests based on current contribution levels, employees may have to work into their seventies or eighties to provide a comfortable retirement. Its analysis is based […]


Gina Miller accuses asset managers of ‘soft-lobbying’ on FCA study

SCM Direct founding partner Gina Miller has accused big asset management firms of “soft-lobbing” the FCA, as fund groups remain secretive on their responses to the regulator’s interim asset management study. Miller has been a key campaigner on Brexit, bringing a successful legal challenge to the Government’s plans to trigger Article 50 without a vote […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I would point out that once the member reaches age 75, any excess over LTA can’t pay a taxable lump sum as suggested above. The charge will always be 25% with the balance retained in the scheme.

  2. How does taking 300K of a 1.2 million pension fund i.e 25% use up 75% of a lifetime allowance of 1.6 million?

    Why limit investment growth if you don’t need to take fund withdrawals? 45% of something is surely better than 0% of nothing!

  3. Retirement chap is correct regarding the fact the lump sum option is not available once the client reaches 75. This fact is often omitted from similar such technical updates.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm