View more on these topics

Long-term care cap pushed back to 2020


The Department of Health is delaying its plans to implement a £72,000 cap on the cost of long-term care.

The cap was expected to come into force from next April, but has now been delayed until 2020.

Care and support minister Alastair Burt says: “A time of consolidation is not the right moment to be implementing expensive new commitments such as this, especially when there are no indications the private insurance market will develop as expected.”

Burt adds the Government will continue to work with the financial sector on how to create products to meet the cost of care.

He says: “To this end I will be holding an urgent meeting with representatives from the insurance industry along with the Treasury and other Government ministers to work through what this announcement means for them and how Government can help them to bring forward new products. These discussions will continue over the summer.”

The cap was devised following a review led by economist Andrew Dilnot, which recommended a limit of £35,000.

Partnership director of corporate affairs Jim Boyd says the move to end an “eye-wateringly expensive” proposal is unsurprising, and may see the cap axed completely.

He says: “If you delay the cap to 2020 it could disappear into the long grass altogether.

“It was being pushed by the Lib Dems, but it was always seen as expensive and very bureaucratic.”

Conservatives have quietly distancing themselves from the policy for months. In February, Prime Minister David Cameron stopped making specific references to the plan.

A Conservative spokeswoman told Money Marketing at the time that this did not represent a downgrade for the policy.

She said: “From April 2016 the Government will pay for people’s care once the cost to them hits £72,000 – and the threshold for the means test on residential care will rise from £23,000 to £118,000.

“That way those with the most serious needs can be certain that their costs will not keep piling up.”



Dilnot reforms fail to spark long-term care market

A lack of demand and regulatory uncertainty is killing off the insurance industry’s appetite to create long-term care products, providers warn. Just a year ago the Association British Insurers and the Government agreed a statement of intent pledging to boost awareness of care issues and encourage insurers to launch products to help people meet the […]

Pressure to bring forward Dilnot LTC cap

More than 1,500 people have signed a petition calling for the Government to introduce its £72,000 cap on long-term care costs a year earlier than planned. The petition had received 1,565 signatures as Money Marketing went to press. It requires 100,000 signatures to be considered for debate in the House of Commons. In March, the Government […]

Advisers attack Govt for ignoring Dilnot’s £35k cap proposal

Advisers have criticised the Government for failing to implement Andrew Dilnot’s long-term care funding recommendations in full. The Government this week announced it will introduce a care cost cap of £75,000 in April 2017. The asset threshold above which people will be unable to claim support from the state will be increased from £23,250 to […]


Mobius replaced as lead manager on £1.9bn investment trust

Mark Mobius has been replaced as lead portfolio manager on the Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust, with Carlos Hardenberg taking over. Hardenberg is senior vice president and managing director of the Templeton Emerging Markets Group and will take up the new role in October, after relocating to London. Mobius will remain portfolio manager on the £1.9bn fund, supporting Hardenberg, and will […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Soren Lorenson 17th July 2015 at 2:11 pm

    The cap was a poorly though out piece of legislation that was going to cost local authorities millions of pounds to implement whilst providing a benefit to individuals of around £175 a week, assuming that they survived for around 6 years. Most people would never receive any benefit but the local authority had to keep an account for every single person in care and perform a needs assessment.

    Clearly local authorities have been praying very hard indeed because their wish has finally been granted and this silly benefit, I predict, will never see the light of day again.

    Far far better to spend the ridiculous sums that this would have cost to administer on more realistic local authority funding rates.

  2. As Soren implies in her post, the cost of this policy was almost exclusively bureaucratic, as I struggle to think of anyone currently in care for whom the policy would have been any benefit.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm