View more on these topics

FCA reviews ‘lifestyling’ strategies at pension providers

FCA logo glass 620x430

The FCA has said that some providers are failing to check that the ‘lifestyling’ of funds used by advisers is still suitable in the wake of pension freedoms.

The regulator conducted a review late last year into whether lifestyle investment strategies – which, up until the pension freedoms, tended to gradually alter a client’s asset mix up until retirement point to target common tax-free cash and annuity purchase levels – were still appropriate post-freedoms.

The FCA has found that, when those investment profiles were set up on a bespoke basis by advisers, trustees or employers, some pension providers were not reaching out to advisers regarding how these are structured.

The FCA’s report reads: “Most life insurers view the responsibility to review bespoke lifestyle strategies as sitting with the third parties who set them up. In some instances, life insurers are undertaking proactive modelling of bespoke lifestyling strategies to assess appropriateness for themselves.

“Most life insurers have taken, or are planning to take, a proactive approach to communicating with both third parties and consumers about the need to review the appropriateness of bespoke strategies. We are concerned, however, that some firms claim they have little or no responsibility for such strategies and have no plans to proactively communicate with third parties, instead waiting to be contacted by them.”

For legacy business likely written before 2001, the FCA said it had specific concerns about how long it was taking providers to review lifestyling arrangements.

For new business and post-2010 auto-enrolment contracts however, the FCA said it was pleased that most firms “had reviewed the appropriateness of lifestyle…had created new default funds and lifestyle glidepaths, and had communicated with relevant customers when migration exercises have taken place.”



Providers plan mass transfer out of outdated lifestyle funds

Providers are eyeing a mass transfer of workplace pension customers from out-of-date lifestyle funds. Last week Scottish Widows announced it would be moving “hundreds of thousands” of customers from annuity-targeting strategies to flight paths that assume they will stay invested into retirement. The firm said it found only 25 per cent of customers had bought an […]


Aegon launches low-cost lifestyle funds for pension investors

Aegon has launched seven lifestyle investment funds designed to provide savers with more certainty about the size of annuity they can buy when they reach retirement. The funds, which have been designed in conjunction with Morningstar OBSR, adopt a two-stage investment approach. In the initial phase, each fund attempts to provide investment growth which is […]

Novia launches lifestyle modelling tool

Novia is offering a new financial modelling tool that will analyse clients’ financial requirements to achieve future lifestyle goals. The Lifestyle Planner includes a needs analysis tool and a shortfall calculator. Novia says it allows advisers to establish which funds are available that meet clients’ requirements. The tool will show the wrappers in which the […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. When reviewing an occupational pension transfer advisers have to start with the assumption that transferring guaranteed income would not be in a clients best interests.

    And yet here the FCA appear to be suggesting that Lifestyling shouldn’t be based on the assumption that the fund will be used to purchase a guaranteed income at retirement.

  2. I am a wee bit confused ?

    I believe life styling to be good and in 99% of cases prudent !

    With 5 years to retirement I do start to alter portfolios and reduce risk based on discussions with my clients, I suppose I take the view that they will purchase an annuity unless there is strong evidence to suggest otherwise again based on client conversations.

    I guess I don’t understand even if you reduced risk via life styling (just to be safe) and the client then opts for a different road at retirement other than annuity, and lost out on potential growth does that mean it was unsuitable ? or was it just a case of “better to be safe than sorry” bearing in mind you investments can go “DOWN” as well as up…… oh sorry the FCA think we all have crystal balls don’t they !

Leave a comment