View more on these topics

Tony Wickenden: Clarity on life assurance policies for non-doms

Tony WickendenLong-awaited guidance clears up confusion around the IHT position of policies issued under seal

Life assurance protection is an often overlooked estate planning tool. For UK-domiciled individuals, effecting a policy subject to a trust can deliver a neat, effective way of sorting inheritance tax liability that cannot be diminished through other planning. It can also be an interesting way to create or enhance an inheritance through the payment of an IHT-free sum assured.

And given the current environment set against aggressive tax planning, you could not get more passive or inoffensive. The taxable estate of the payer of the premiums would be reduced by the premium payments but they would almost always be exempt as normal expenditure out of income or under the annual exemption.

Other than that, the donor’s estate is not reduced as a result of the policy and there will be a ready IHT-free amount of cash to meet the liability. So, good for HM Revenue & Customs’ cash flow. What is not to like?

Specialty debt
Now, those not UK-domiciled or not deemed UK-domiciled will only be potentially liable to IHT on their UK-situs assets. For this purpose, when any UK residential property is held through a trust or other structure (e.g. a company) the outer structure will be ignored and ownership attributed to the non-domiciliary, much like under the annual tax on enveloped dwellings rules except with no minimum property value threshold.

Tony Wickenden: Planning for the perfect tax rate

So what if a non-domiciliary has a life assurance policy effected with a UK insurer? Well, if it is held in an appropriate trust it should be outside of their taxable estate, as it would be for a UK domiciliary.

But there has been another way the policy could be ignored for IHT and that is to have it issued under seal. The understood rule in such cases is that the policy would be treated as a “specialty debt” and as sited where the policy document was physically located at the time of death. So, if this was outside the UK, it would be IHT-free.

There have been developments on specialty debts. A specialty debt is a debt, contract or obligation that:

  • Is executed as a deed;
  • Is incurred under statute;
  • Is a debt of the Crown.

It is a long-established principle of common law that the situs of a specialty debt (i.e. its location for legal purposes) is the place in which the document recording is physically situated.

By ensuring the deed recording a specialty debt is physically stored outside the UK, it has therefore been possible to ensure the debt itself will be treated as excluded property and so fall outside the scope of the charge to UK IHT for non-domiciled and non-deemed domiciled individuals.

Tony Wickenden: New rules on taxation of non-UK residents’ property disposal

In relation to life assurance policies taken out by UK resident non-domiciliaries, if they are executed by way of deed or under seal and held offshore, their proceeds should not be subject to IHT (for as long as they also remain non-UK domiciled or deemed domiciled for IHT purposes).

About turn
HMRC’s approach to specialty debts had followed the accepted common law position. However, in 2013, it abruptly changed its stance and revised its guidance to state that “many such debts are likely to be located where the debtor resides or where property taken as security for the debts is situated”.

It advised insurers the position would be aligned to the understood view up to 2013 in relation to life policies written under seal unless the arrangement is “artificial”. But despite this “reassurance”, UK insurers and UK resident non-domiciled individuals were left in a position that was less than certain.

Danby Bloch: Why industry must fight for entrepreneurs’ relief

An update has now finally emerged and the revised guidance (which can be found in the IHT Manual at IHTM27079, IHTM27080 and IHTM27104) confirms that:

  • Where the specialty debt is secured on land or other tangible property situated in the UK, the situs of the debt will also be in the UK;
  • Where the debt is not secured, the common law approach will generally be followed unless both the creditor and debtor are UK residents;
  • Life policies executed by way of deed or under seal will be treated as situated where the deed/policy is to be found, provided the policyholder is non-UK domiciled and there is no evidence to suggest the location of the documents has been artificially arranged. Lloyds policies will not be treated as specialty debts unless they also bear the witnessed personal signature of the general manager of Lloyds policy signing office. Lloyds policies that do not bear this signature are chargeable to IHT in the country where the debtor resides.

The publication of the long-awaited guidance will be welcomed by insurers and policyholders. Short of artificiality, IHT freedom should be secured. Of course, to be absolutely sure, a trust could be used. In either case, it is essential the non-domiciled individual takes advice on the impact of whatever strategy they adopt in the country in which they are domiciled.

Policies with an overseas insurer are not affected by this guidance and will always be excluded property in the hands of a non-UK domiciled investor.

Tony Wickenden is joint managing director of Technical Connection. You can find him by tweeting @tecconn



Flat-rate pension tax relief ruled out by government

The government has effectively ruled out major changes to pension tax relief in the forthcoming Budget, arguing that there is “no clear consensus” for fundamental reform. In a report earlier this year, MPs on the Treasury committee suggested that current tax reliefs were not incentivising sufficient saving, and called on the government to consider whether […]

Royal Court of Justice High Court 480

FCA evidence throws Sipp provider court case into doubt

The FCA has asked if it can submit a new legal argument as Sipp provider Berkeley Burke continues its pivotal legal challenge to a Financial Ombudsman Service ruling against it. The FCA provided evidence in the case, acting as interested party to the judicial review, as it could inform the future appoach from regulators over what […]

A tough start for 2017 consensus trades

By Kacper Brzezniak Every year, starting around November, investment banks (and fund managers) begin to drip out their outlooks for currencies, rates, economies, you name it, for the following year. The consensus has been largely wrong for the past four or five years; those multiple rate hikes never came, the bond market is still alive […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm