View more on these topics

LIA&#39s view

The Financial Services Skills Council recently called us all in for yet another account of the progress of the examination review.

The review kicked off at the end of the 1990s and everyone will have read CP157, the various interim documents and the latest document, CP194, on which the FSA will give its feedback next month.

We were told in 1999 that a new exam framework for all those who fall under FSA regulation would provide a modular structure, career mobility and international acceptance. Last year, we were told that the Skills Council would deliver the necessary standards. I am afraid we as yet have none of these features in the minimal proposals which have come forward.

Many people argue that the Skills Council and FSA should be setting a more ambitious level for exams but we must remember that the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority sits above this structure. The FPC and equivalent are set at level 3. To argue that we should move to the next QCA level (level 4) presupposes that advisers could get up to something like AFPC or higher. An enforcement of that process would quite frankly decimate the sector. But there is nothing to stop us from gradually pushing up the level, as the CII has done with its savings and investment exam and its half-credits related to the AFPC. Voluntary action to move to level 4 is a very good thing but we cannot enforce the pace.

We are likely to see the compulsory exams stay at the same level as the FPC and equivalent although the content may be improved, provided the new learning objectives and syllabuses published soon by the Skills Council do the job.

A big issue in the new framework is the proposed workplace-based advice skills module. If the Skills Council insists on its idea that the advice skills module would be largely dealt with by workplace assessment, we would lose the objective testing which is so important. Objective testing is needed for communicating the level of knowledge to the consumer, to ensure quality of adviser/consumer interaction and to assist employment mobility for those in the business. Returning to in-house assessment would mean that anyone wishing to seek a new job would not have clear objective credentials to present to a new potential employer.

There is nothing to stop exam bodies from providing objective testing but we need the Skills Council to clearly signal that advice skills should be objectively tested as well as assessed in the workplace. We have a lot of work to do. Will the Skills Council perform the functions envisaged for it?

John Ellis is head of public affairs at the LIA

Recommended

Conmen jailed after IFA&#39s detective work

An IFA has stopped a notorious gang of conmen preying on the disabled and elderly after spotting a series of suspect payments leaving his client&#39s bank account. David Rackham, a Havant adviser with Berry Birch& Noble Financial Planning, became suspicious when he saw thousands of pounds disappearing from his client Patrick Pitt&#39s account. Rackham, who […]

Woolwich Plan Managers – Capital Plus Plan

Type: Guaranteed equity bond Aim: Growth linked to the performance of the FTSE 100 index Minimum-maximum investment:£3,000-£500.000. Isa £7,000 Term: Six years Return: 25% growth on initial investment or 50% growth in the FTSE 100 index Guarantee: Original capital returned in full regardless of performance of index Closing date: April 16, 2004, April 2, 2004 […]

Network looks for tech-friendly advisers

Former In Partnership dir-ector Shin Yamada has lined up 20 IFAs to join his new network project called Keystone Advisers Partnership. Yamada says he wants to get around 50 RIs on board and is offering a flat fee service which he says will beat most other networks for IFAs with annual turnovers of more than […]

X-ray marks the Star spot

It&#39s the Pru, Jim, but not as we know it. Diary hears that a model of the Starship Enterprise caused Prudential&#39s IT division to run for cover a few weeks ago when it sparked off an over-sensitive X-ray machine. The Diary knows that unsolicited marketing material can get a bit annoying but calling in the […]

US election

Capital Market Notes, November 2016 David Lafferty, chief market strategist at Natixis Global Asset Management, looks at the impact on markets and portfolios since the somewhat surprising outcome of the US election. Click here

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com