View more on these topics

LIA should have stayed silent on polarisation

I am sure this is not the first letter you have received from an IFA on


polarisation but I feel I must make my point. I have been a member of the


LIA for more than 15 years, during which I think that I have been


supportive of the organisation, notwithstanding that I have felt, from time


to time, that you have deserved criticism.


Even in my very earliest days as a member, I remember well having my say


about your sitting on the fence over certain issues and it seems that:


“Plus ga change, plus c&#39est la meme chose.”


One of the expressions I used previously was that those who sit on the


fence often hurt their private parts. It would appear that you have done


the same again. I think there are two truisms, first, you can&#39t please all


of the people all of the time and, second, another one of my heartfelt


complaints is that you seem to make policy decisions without a franchise.


I can&#39t remember being canvassed as to my view. When it suits you, you


labour the point of being a democratic organisation but the way you operate


seems to owe more to lessons learnt from the Kremlin than the Electoral


Reform Society.


To the matter in hand concerning your much publicised view on


polarisation. If it were not for the fact that I have worked to obtain the


qualifications and will need to continue paying subscriptions in order to


continue to use them, I would have resigned forthwith.


That is the only reason that I now stay a member. As a point of principle,


I am no longer prepared to support the LIA in any other way whatsoever. I


feel that in this instance you really have gone too far.


I appreciate that yours is a broad church and you want to please both


camps. In this case, I think a prolonged period of silence would have been


appropriate rather than risk alienating your IFA constituents.


You were under no compulsion to have your tuppence-worth and sometimes


keeping your own counsel is the wisest course.


It would not surprise me if this latest action has been one of your most


damaging to date and you certainly seem to have handed your detractors a


club with which to beat you. It seems that what many of us have suspected


for a long while is now indeed the case – you are the representatives of


the direct foot-in-the-door salesmen and have been paying only lip service


to the independent sector.


At least your assertion that there are companies whose products are so


narrow or poor that they need access to others is of itself a vindication


of the principle of independent advice.


If you or others felt that the independent sector were not independent


enough, the logical course would have been to strengthen polarisation and


perhaps constrain the panel system rather than propound a course that would


lead to the dilution of independent and impartial advice.


It is with regret that I have written this letter.



Harry Katz


Norwest Consultants


Stanmore,


Middlesex

Recommended

Complex bill must have more time

Why so little comment on the committee stage of the Financial Services andMarkets Bill wending its torturous way through the House of Lords withnearly 1,500 amendments being debated and more to come?This bill is intended to replace the 1986 Financial Services Act which wasitself rushed through Parliament with numerous quirks and flaws that MMcolumns attest […]

Nice to be in control

If anyone is still able to follow David Playfair&#39s logic(?) (MoneyMarketing, March 30), let me briefly finalise the issue.I confess to ignorance but only of clairvoyance, not product knowledge.My own circumstances allowed me to finish a 25-year mortgage in 14 years,paying what I wanted when I wanted, not whatever was demanded whether Iliked it or […]

Line of the times

If you asked a financial business two years ago whether call centresgenerated pro-fit or were simply a necess-ary evil, 100 per centwould have ans^_wered the latter, claims Data^_mon^_itor consultant SteveMorrell.The traditional image of a call centre is a noisy, jam-packed roomwith badly paid employees answering continuous calls from distant clients.Boards flash up, announcing the number […]

Tesco yanks out Barclays cash machines

Tesco has announced that it is pulling out more than 70 Barclays cash machines from its supermarkets.The move is being touted as the grocery chain&#39s reaction to Barclays&#39 decision to charge non-customers a pound fee per transaction on their machines as of January 1.To replace the withdrawn machines, Tesco will install ones from its personal […]

Reforming India: just the beginning

By Kunal Desai, Neptune India Fund

As global investors continue to scour emerging markets through the lens of reform potential, India shines bright. Indeed, we think it can sparkle even brighter. We anticipate India’s self-imposed 10-year ‘policy holiday’ to turn into one of the most pro-growth and pro-investment policy calendars seen in Asia in years. The Indian electorate has engineered a historic verdict. We now have the strongest Indian government since 1984, with the pro-market Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) achieving an absolute majority for the first time in the party’s history.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment