View more on these topics

LIA assesses the situation before making comment

I was surprised to say the least at the comments by Donna Bradshaw in last week&#39s Money Marketing about the LIA&#39s interpretation of the Sandler report.

It should hardly need pointing out that the LIA analyses Government/ regulatory statements very closely and any comment we make, whether immediately after publication or later, is based on sound assessment. I do not appreciate a rush to judgement about what the LIA might or might not have done without at least the courtesy of discussing the matter with us.

The key to the problem posed by the Sandler comments on remuneration is conceded by Donna. She talks about commission offset and then says: “Under Sandler, as it stands, this would be lost as the report proposes that the provider offers the product to the adviser at a wholesale price, with the adviser then offering the product to the client at a retail price.”

The net effect might well, in theory, look similar to the current arrangements but Sandler also says there would be a crucial difference. The consumer would have explicitly agreed the payment made to the adviser at an early stage in the process. We have had commission disclosure for some years. No LIA member is reluctant to disclose remuneration to a client. Enhancing transparency would not be a problem. But Sandler is asking the consumer to agree explicitly to a “mark-up”.That adds an entirely new dimension. It puts all transactions on a fee basis.

Obviously, for fee-charging IFAs, there should not be a problem. The problem does arise where consumers are not interested in the cost of advice and are quite happy with the arrangement where this amount is costed into the product without any further discussion.

We do not, of course, know what the FSA will eventually say about all this. But I would predict that if the eventual policy adopted is similar to Sandler&#39s suggestion, then there will be some considerable difficulty for IFAs who are working on a commission-only basis.

We need to think very carefully about the wishes of clients. As Donna well knows, a good many of them are very happy with the current arrangement. Perhaps I might sum up the comments that we have made to the FSA and others about this issue with the very simple statement: “The punters won&#39t like it.”

John Ellis

LIA head of public affairs,

Chorleywood,Hertfordshire

Recommended

Occupational therapy

It would be easy but wrong to infer from a recent Money Marketing article headlined, Final straw as the FSA makes pension U-turn, that company pensions are not as attractive as they used to be.An occupational pension is almost always the best deal for those lucky enough to have access to one because the employer […]

Why did life offices cave in to 1%?

The unholy mess into which the industry seems have got itself trying to function in the ridiculous and destructive 1 per cent world is, in my opinion, principally the fault of most of the life companies themselves.Anyone with an ounce of business sense must have known right from the start that the entire 1 per […]

Rothschild chief executive to join Deutsche

Rothschild Asset Management chief executive Paul Manduca will join Deutsche Asset Management in December in a move widely predicted by the industry.Manduca will become DAM&#39s CEO for Europe after announcing last week that he did not expect to have a future role with RAM now the company was seeking a buyer or merger partner.He will […]

Britannic blames cross-sell failure for stakeholder exit

Britannic Assurance claims that its failure to cross-sell products to stakeholder policyholders has forced it to pull out of stakeholder, even though it has a 5 per cent share of the market.It is ending its stakeholder project and axing 200 jobs after a 35 per cent fall in profits to £52m in the first half […]

Time for a new approach to asset allocation

Trevor Greetham, RLAM’s head of multi asset, introduces the recentlylaunched RL GMAPs. Asset allocation has become an increasingly difficult challenge for investors and advisers in the years since the financial crisis. Sometimes violent price swings in stock and commodity markets coupled with the collapse in the rate of interest on bonds have made it harder […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com