The phrase “divide and conquer” has been attributed to many different people over time, including kings, emperors and other historic figures.
The strategy has long been used by those in or seeking power to encourage divisions among subjects or opposing forces by fostering distrust. It is also used to encourage meaningless expenditure to reduce the capacity for action or progress.
You might be asking where I am going with this. Well, rather than being on the receiving end of some malevolent outside force, I really do wonder if we are inflicting this strategy upon ourselves.
Daniel Godfrey’s dramatic departure from the Investment Association has got me thinking about the future of our trade and professional bodies.
There are so many that we are, arguably, ridiculously over served by organisations which do not really complement (or compliment) each other. They struggle to convince us they really do stand for their members or the consumer, or both.
On top of this, there seems to be a merry-go-round of high-profile departures, from life companies from the Association of British Insurers to the aforementioned Godfrey. There are also real issues with support and viability for adviser trade bodies.
For example, Apfa appears to be struggling to attract and retain members, while Gill Cardy’s admirable attempt to stand up for the adviser with the Adviser Centre failed to garner enough support to really get going.
These bodies appear to be struggling with the friction inevitably caused by attempting to serve many competing members and deliver the transparencies and benefits the investing public needs. Trying to unravel the proverbial Gordian knot that is lobbying the Government and the regulators on behalf of so many vested interests must be extremely difficult to say the least.
For once, I am going to give the banking sector a bit of a backhanded compliment. The British Bankers’ Association seems to make real headway. It too has lots of different members with competing business styles and approaches to its operational objectives; however, it appears to be able to marshal members effectively and deliver benefits and progress.
It might just be time for our infighting and (sometimes very obvious) attempts to protect vested interests to diminish dramatically for the greater good.
I suspect as long as we advisers, fund managers, platform providers and insurers remain, pretty much by our own choice, splintered and divided, we are ripe to be ruled and conquered.
A strong voice speaking on behalf of the collective appears to carry much more weight with the Treasury and the regulator than what we currently have to offer.
Lee Robertson is chief executive of Investment Quorum