View more on these topics

Leader: FCA wants providers’ necks on the block on inducements

Natalie Holt, journalist with Money Marketing Photo by Michael Walter/Troika

When defending the use of inducements, whether this is via distribution deals or lavish corporate hospitality, providers argue “this is the way business has always been done”. In our cover story this week, one provider somewhat outlandishly claims “we could be damaging customer outcomes” by cracking down on inducements. That is dubious at best.

The culture of provider bungs to advisers seems to be alive and well, despite the various rounds of guidance the regulator has issued on the subject.

The FCA and its predecessor have been predominantly concerned with bias and conflicts of interest. Setting aside the “pay to play” deals of Sesame fame, advisers I speak to are often affronted by any suggestion an invite to a major sporting event would colour their product recommendations in any way. Many advisers keep meticulous corporate hospitality logs, with separate information on business volumes which shows no correlation between the two.

The same is true of journalists. Editors and reporters can be treated to press trips abroad, but this does not equate to reams of positive coverage for the provider hosting the trip. Or at least, it shouldn’t.

Unfortunately, there are journalists who will run glowing pieces about why now is the time to invest in China or the US after returning from a fund manager-sponsored jolly. (Happily, these journalists are not employed by MM). Equally, as much as it will gall the many principled advisers, there are likely to be some firms who are being unduly influenced by providers.

Recent letters sent to a number of major providers by the FCA clearly spell out that tacking seminars onto corporate hospitality, and training costs that significantly outweigh the cost price, are unacceptable business practice.

After years of decreeing rules from on high, the FCA is now insisting providers put their necks on the block, requiring them to sign compliance guarantees, carry out reviews and testify that their businesses are fit for purpose. Firms that continue to push the boundaries of what is acceptable will ultimately find themselves across the board table from FCA enforcement.

Yet this is not just about household names. Little-known, obscure providers are also at it. One marketing promotion being circulated offers no less than a helicopter chauffeur service as part of a day at Silverstone, which could be yours in exchange for ploughing a mere £500,000 into a particular investment scheme. Clearly the FCA has a lot more work to do.

Natalie Holt is editor of Money Marketing. Follow her on Twitter: @Natalie_Holt_MM



Lloyds profits dragged down by PPI claims deadline

Lloyds Banking Group has posted an 11 per cent drop in profits for 2015 after it set aside £4bn for missold payment protection insurance. The bank has reported a pre-tax profit of £1.6bn, compared with a £1.8bn profit in 2014. Of Lloyd’s total £4bn PPI provision, £2.1bn was set aside between October and December, after […]


Former pensions minister accused of scaremongering over tax-free cash fears

Advisers have accused former pensions minister Steve Webb of scaremongering over claims George Osborne will scrap pensions tax-free lump sums in the Budget. The Chancellor is currently considering fundamental reform of pension tax relief, including potentially overhauling the system so pensions are taxed in a similar way to Isas. Webb, who is now director of […]


Royal London swoops for Axa UK protection arm

Royal London is finalising a bid for Axa Wealth’s protection business, Money Marketing understands. The mutual is believed to be in second round talks with the insurer, along with several other potential buyers, in a deal insiders estimate at £40m. In August 2015 Money Marketing revealed the French-owned wealth manager was up for sale. Royal […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. And what of the NHS Trust inducing opt outs of auto enrolment?

  2. And what about the F-pack itself? How do you gag a potential critic? Give them a job.

  3. I received an email about that Silverstone trip myself (it was drawn to the immediate attention of the FCA via Twitter). Talk about shameless behaviour.

    As for inducements more widely, my views are reproduced here

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm