View more on these topics

Editor’s note: FAMR hasn’t failed; it’s just solved a different problem

In August 2015, I made the mistake of checking my work emails late one Sunday evening. Instead of turning in for the night, I poured myself a fresh cup of coffee and turned my laptop on. The reason was an embargoed press release from the FCA announcing it was about to undertake a wholesale assessment of the advice sector.

The Financial Advice Market Review was already being badged as ‘RDR Mark Two’ come Monday morning. More accurately, it seemed intent on addressing the unintended consequences of the RDR; that increasing the qualifications threshold and turning off revenue streams from commission had priced consumers out of the market.

The goal of FAMR was stated as to explore ways “government, industry and regulators can take individual and collective steps to stimulate the development of a market to deliver affordable and accessible financial advice and guidance to everyone”.

This time two years ago, a final report was released containing 28 recommendations for reforming the advice market. That’s a lot of recommendations – too many, arguably, to focus on any one of them.

In April 2017, this was followed up with another progress report. There have indeed been significant strides forwards since FAMR. From tightening up the boundary between advice and guidance to guiding the Financial Services Compensation Scheme funding review, encouraging employers to facilitate advice and setting up a dedicated unit for automated services, the FCA, Treasury and industry have been diligently working their way through that lengthy list of reforms.

Our cover story this week: FAMR two years on

Twenty-four months may be a short time in advice, but the market seems disappointed at the lack of progress in closing the so-called advice gap as we reach FAMR’s two-year anniversary.

Yet, the reality remains that not everyone needs advice. In fact, most people don’t. Once you realise this, the size of the supposed advice gap reduces accordingly.

The FCA and Treasury know this all too well. Scratch the surface and you see that the aim was only really to expand advice to those who should receive it. Ensuring consumers get the financial help they require by making sure there are no barriers to giving guidance or information to those who do not need fully regulated advice has taken centre stage in officials’ thinking.

Just look at the priority this was given in the final FAMR report. The very first recommendation was to amend the definition of advice. The second was on how to regulate guidance. Re-reading the mission statement, FAMR wanted to deliver “financial advice and guidance” to all, not just advice.

The government and FCA keep saying they don’t want providers to be hamstrung when they want to give some sort of financial assistance. FAMR’s chief success has been in reassuring them they will not bear regulatory responsibility for advice should they decide to give only a helpful steer on potential options.

More consumers will get financial help thanks to FAMR, that much is for sure. It just might not be from your traditional IFA this time.



Which firms are winning the race on wealth management?

Traditional wealth managers have proved themselves to be scalable and profitable businesses despite the hype caused by robo-advice models, analysts say. Wealth managers have also been shown to be more robust than pure asset managers amid mounting pressure on fund performance and fees. While Hargreaves Lansdown and St James’s Place continue to make the headlines […]


Fears over investment trust sales as new disclosure hikes costs

Investment trust sales may come under pressure due to new EU rules, experts have warned. The potential benefits of gearing on investment trusts risk being overlooked as new cost reporting rules make them look more expensive compared with open-ended funds. Traditionally, closed-ended funds have looked attractive based on lower costs compared with other structures, as […]

Fund managers cut London hiring by half since Brexit vote

Fund managers in London have slashed their hiring by nearly half since the Brexit vote, while recruitment in Paris and Luxembourg has risen, according to new data. A Financial Times report says data from professional networking site LinkedIn shows the number of London-based investment management job ads posted on its site fell in the first […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. If you say so Justin. Personally I think the regulators have right and royally messed up with RDR, in spite of the good things that have come out of it. And the spending of £millions on defining words to describe guidance and advice is wasteful, unhelpful and a failure to see priorities. So whether or not it is a failure there is no sign of a market developing to offer help to people who want specific recommendations at an affordable price when they have very little money.

  2. “Yet, the reality remains that not everyone needs advice. In fact, most people don’t. Once you realise this, the size of the supposed advice gap reduces accordingly.”

    Rather reminiscent of 1984, if history is inconvenient just re-write it.

    Practically speaking though the proof of the pudding is, as they say, in the eating. Lots more people will no doubt be saving as a result of FAMR…

    If someone could show me a bowl that would be a start.

Leave a comment