View more on these topics

L&C: Steve Webb is right to challenge providers with switchable annuities

There has been plenty of criticism on the Money Marketing website of pensions minister Steve Webb’s switchable annuity plans since they were floated last weekend. However, London & Colonial head of business and product development Adam Wrench believes Webb is on the right track. 

Adam Wrench London & Colonial

In December, London & Colonial polled 2,000 IFAs and asked them: “with industry commentators calling for more product innovation within the annuity market, would you support the development of a reviewable lifetime annuity which could be rebroked/reviewed on an annual basis to ensure receipt of the best available rate, similar to car insurance?”

A rather significant 77 per cent of respondents said yes.

It’s no surprise then that we fully support the spirit and intentions behind Steve Webb’s suggestions for “switchable” annuities. We agree that the annuity market needs to be overhauled.

It is no surprise either that there have been negative industry reactions to Webb’s calls for change. Given the conventional annuity market has been virtually unchallenged and has barely changed at all over the last 80 years, the insurers have probably been in a comfort zone and content to stick with the status quo.

Legislation already exists to allow clients to transfer from one annuity to another. It is the traditional annuity insurers themselves that have yet to come up with a creative response to market pressure.

In recent press reports some actuaries have unsurprisingly been able to forecast doom and gloom that including a switch option could see annuity rates fall by up to 25 per cent.

It is relatively straightforward for actuaries to look at all the assumptions they make when pricing their annuity contract, change one or two of them to accommodate a switchable feature and then summarise that the impact of this feature will be that rates will fall further.

However, this approach does not really address the point – it isn’t that assumptions underlying traditional annuities need to be changed. I think this switchable concept is being too narrowly thought of as simply being able to switch between one traditional annuity and another. 

We need to be able to provide clients’ incomes using essentially differently structured annuities that will be a better answer to the demands of the consumers of the 21st century.

Over 10 years ago HMRC issued a paper on modernising annuities but apart from a small number of offices bringing out flexible annuities the mainstream market has remained unchanged. It is therefore no surprise to us that the Government has felt (at last) compelled to act.

Insurance companies have never got it – in that the public generally and to some extent advisers no longer have the confidence in insurers that they used to have in years gone by.  The market has also become more suspicious of annuities – in particular because of the inevitable lack of understanding of how these products and their cross-subsidies work and the absence of policy specific charges.

If the Government is now looking for more innovation in the interests of openness and flexibility then perhaps new products should include at least some or preferably all of the following features:

  1. A lifetime income but without the lifetime lock in
  2. A flexible structure that provides guaranteed returns
  3. Reviews of the income each year in the light of general market rates at that time
  4. If the client’s health or personal situation changes and then qualifies for enhanced rates then the annuity can be reviewed/switched on this basis
  5. On death the mortality profit (any actual or notional “left over” funds on death) are used to benefit the client’s dependants or heirs rather than being used in some indeterminable manner for the benefit of longer-lived annuitants or even the reserves or profits of the insurer itself.

The FCA is already undertaking a review into annuity transparency of charges and commissions as well as distribution. Until such time as the distribution of annuities is rationalised then a fully level playing field will not exist.

The Government must attempt to create an annuity market with a level playing field so that consumers once again drive change and competition is encouraged as should be the case in any free market.

Adam Wrench is head of business and product development at London & Colonial



FCA chief Martin Wheatley: If I could do the RDR again…

FCA chief executive Martin Wheatley would have introduced the RDR more quickly and delivered all the new measures at the same time if he could implement the reforms again. Speaking at a press conference in London this week, Wheatley said: “It would have been nice to get everything done in one go. The fact that […]


Perspective directors step down in shake-up

Perspective Financial Group will no longer pursue adviser acquisitions as part of a shake-up which has seen group operations director Peter Craddock and finance director Phil Carr leave the business. Craddock remains in a consultancy role to help Perspective transition to new management. He has also been appointed to the Regulatory Decisions Committee, which hears appeals […]


Finance director departs Origen

Origen finance director Matthew Moore has left the business. The advice firm says his departure follows the completion of the transition of Origen’s Sipp book over to Suffolk Life. Origen sold its Sipp plans to Suffok Life in May with the transfer completing at the end of last year. Business development director Mark Pearson says: […]


MM Leader: Making sure Pica directory is a positive force

The launch of a user-friendly directory setting out how advisers and brokers can help the general public ensure they are getting the best out of their pension pot should be something to celebrate. Unfortunately the Pension Income Choice Association’s new Pick-A website has been subject to a volley of criticism from advisers concerned that some […]

Key themes for 2017

Capital Market Notes, December 2016 Dave Lafferty, chief market strategist at Natixis Global Asset Management, assesses the accuracy of his 2016 outlook and provides his thoughts and outlook for 2017. Click here to read the full article


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. This was tried in the past and is still in the market place now. Its called drawdown. It has been a disaster – you need only ask those who have suffered via this product for their views. I am curious to see the questions on the survey mentioned. Do they include the fact that in order to achieve this flexability, the income rates would plummet even further in order to achieve this? I doubt it very much.
    I am all for reforming the market to try to get better rates for clients and I think a very quick and easy way to do this would be to remove the very restrictive investing criteria that Governments have placed upon Insurers for annuity monies they receive. It this day and age it is ridiculous that annuity providers cannot decide for themselves how to invest to get the best long-term returns and hence better long-term incomes for people. That would be a very good starting point and would not mean that everyones rates would have to fall again in favour of flexability.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm