View more on these topics

Law firm seeks second judicial review on behalf of Arch cru investors

Law firm Regulatory Legal is looking to launch a judicial review of the FSA’s £54m compensation package for Arch cru investors on behalf of 2,700 investors.

This week, pressure group Justice in Financial Services filed a separate claim for a judicial review of the compensation package on behalf of Coull Money, an IFA firm that recommended the CF Arch cru funds. Coull Money has applied to the FSA to cancel its regulatory permissions.

In June, the FSA revealed that Capita Financial Managers, BNY Mellon Trust & Depositary and HSBC Bank had agreed to contribute to the £54m fund, which will be used to make payments to eligible CF Arch cru investors.

Alongside distributions already made and remaining assets, investors who accept the compensation deal should receive around 70 per cent of the net asset value of their funds when the range was suspended in March 2009.

As part of the agreed compensation, payments from cases brought to the Financial Ombudsman Service against Capita, BNY Mellon and HSBC will be restricted so that they are similar to the payments that would be awarded through the compensation package.

Investors will still be able to pursue their IFA for further compensation.

Regulatory Legal says it will look for a judicial review on the basis that investors have been asked to accept an offer without having enough knowledge about it.
Partner Gareth Fatchett says: “We have no doubt that this is an arguable case. It is appropriate that IFAs have submitted an application as well, because we cannot just let this offer drift by and accept it.”

Axxis Financial Planning director Owen Wintersgill says: “It is ludicrous if investors have to accept the compensation package without knowing what the full settlement is.”

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Joe Egerton - Justice in Financial Services 29th September 2011 at 9:29 am

    One of the grounds given in the Coull money Application is that the Investors do not have information on which to make an informed choice. For more information contact http://www.justiceinfinace.org

  2. Fight! Fight!

    I think I’ll apply for a judicial review to end all judicial reviews… they cost the industry a lot of money and very few have any effect whatsoever, like a midge on an elephant’s bum!!

    But then again it keeps the FSA’s legal team and expensive external ‘advisers’ in gainful employment while filling up column inches with something to read and wince at.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com