View more on these topics

Labour calls for debate on ‘insignificant’ FCA fines

Labour is calling for a public debate on whether the FCA needs to issue bigger fines and raised concerns over the accountability of the new regulator.

Speaking at a fringe event at the Labour conference today, shadow Treasury financial secretary Chris Leslie said fines are often seen as “insignificant” to the financial institutions involved. 

JP Morgan was fined £137.6m by the FCA and an extra £434.5m by US regulators for the “London Whale” trading losses at the bank.

Responding to a question from Money Marketing about the difference in fine levels between the UK and the US, Leslie said parliament needs to debate the issue. 

He said: “We need to have a proper strategic discussion about the level of fines because it seems to be very ad hoc. There doesn’t seem to be a massive amount of legislative guidance on what those are. If it is sentencing in the courts then we know politicians spend a lot of time angsting about whether sentences are correct and at what level but we don’t seem to have that discussion for financial services.

“What is the sliding scale? Is the FCA drawing these figures from the air? People want to know you have a rational basis for it because if you are talking about changing behaviour then for JP Morgan or others these fines are half a day’s profits. They sound big to the man on the street but they are insignificant in many ways.”

Leslie said he is anxious about the chain of accountability for the new financial regulators, the FCA and PRA, and wants to make them more accountable to parliament.

He said: “Should there be a set of safety valves between parliament and the regulator to discuss issues such as the size of fines and other issues that aren’t necessarily legislative? It would be about keeping the regulators on their toes, I know we have a select committee but it doesn’t quite do it for me.”

FCA director of policy, risk and research Chris Woolard said the regulator works within a defined legislative framework. 

He said: “We do work within a legislative framework although we have a degree of ability to set the rules within it.There is a little bit of a danger of playing ‘my dad is bigger than your dad’, particularly with the US. We have to get to a stage where we are providing proportional penalties for what we see in terms of whether they are reasonable and if they fit the nature of the offence.”



IMA: Labour fund tax plans will cost savers £145m a year

The Investment Management Association has warned Labour proposals to re-introduce the ‘Schedule 19’ tax paid by UK-based funds would cost savers and investors £145m a year. Speaking at the Labour party conference in Brighton at the weekend, Ed Miliband pledged to scrap the so-called “bedroom tax”, a reform to housing benefit which came into force […]

Labour cautions on retrospective group commission ban; pushes standard 50bps charge

Shadow pensions minister Gregg McClymont has urged caution as policymakers eye a retrospective ban on consultancy charging and commission associated with group schemes. The Government has banned consultancy charging since May when it first announced its plans but it is also considering retrospective action on charges levied between January and May. The Department for Work […]

Gregg McClymont hints at pensions tax relief reform

Shadow pensions minister Gregg McClymont has signalled Labour is likely to propose new pension tax relief reforms. The Pensions Policy Institute published a paper in July with options for reform including the possibility of a flat 30 per cent tax relief rate. The Treasury and Association of British Insurers have also called for a debate […]

Time to stop the salami slicing on tax relief

Steve Webb  – Director of Policy and External Communications As the Autumn Statement approaches, Steve Webb calls for the Government to stop tinkering with tax relief. Twice a year, in the run-up to the Spring Budget and the Autumn Statement, we face a torrent of speculation as to what changes the Chancellor might make to […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. “The regulator works within a defined legislative framework.” But clearly not within the legislative framework of the Statutory Code of Practice for Regulators. If parliament wants the FSA to be more accountable, it needs to establish an Independent Regulatory Oversight Committee with the unassailable authority to say to the regulator This is wrong and you aren’t going to do it or This is wrong and you’re going to have to undo it. Anything less is just hot air.

  2. You reap what you sow. The two numpties Dave & George let the Genie out of the bottle and swiped the proceeds of fines for their own nefarious and non transparent purposes, instead of leaving them to fund regulation.

    Now the uber -spendthrifts (AKA the Labour Party) have suddenly twigged another way to milk the sector.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm