First, you need to ensure a plan is in place to satisfy this need. Second, you need to ensure this plan is as tax-efficient as possible.For example, clients Alan, Brian and Colin have been shareholding directors in ABC Trading for the past two years. If Alan dies, what will happen to his shareholding? Clearly, much depends on whether Alan has made a will. Let us assume he has left everything to his wife Danielle, who has never had the slightest interest in the affairs of the company. Thus, it seems unlikely that it will be in the best interests of the company for her to begin to have an interest in it. Besides, it is almost certainly not what the surviving directors would want. What is the solution? The answer is a cross-option agreement. This creates an option for the survivors to buy the deceased’s shares and an option for the deceased’s executors to sell the shares to the survivors. If either of the parties exercises their option, then the other party must comply with it. The effect is exactly as with the more straightforward buy-and-sell agreement. However, it preserves inheritance tax business property relief since no binding contract for sale existed on death. However, on Danielle’s later death, her estate will suffer inheritance tax on the cash realised from selling Alan’s shares. Would it not therefore be better to advise Alan to complete a codicil to his will leaving his shares to a discretionary trust for the benefit of his wife and children? In this way, the cash will bypass Danielle’s estate and the value of Alan’s shares will finally pass to their children in a more inheritance tax-efficient manner. Returning to the exercise of the options, how can the survivors ensure they can afford to exercise their option? They will need cash at the time that one of them dies. This is what life insurance does best. How should you write the policies? The most flexible solution would be for each of your clients to effect a policy on their own life and to make it subject to a suitable trust for their co-directors. If one of the clients chooses to leave the company, the trust might allow the benefits of their policy to revert to them, should the remaining directors agree. If the trust allows this, does this create a liability under the new pre-owned assets tax? At the time of writing, it seems it does. However, the insurance industry has made very strong representations to the Inland Revenue that this should not be the case and is hopeful of an imminent positive change in this area. If no change is forthcoming, then advisers should reconsider this aspect of the trust. Also, if the trust allows the benefits to revert to your client if they leave the company, does this not create a gift with reservation for inheritance tax purposes? If you can show that your clients have each effected policies under similar trusts as part of a commercial transaction at arm’s length, there can be no gift and, thus, there can be no gift with reservation. Therefore, they will have preserved the inheritance tax advantages normally associated with a trust. Let us say that Alan has agreed to effect a policy on his own life in trust for the others. Provided they respond by effecting similar policies under similar trusts, including Alan as a beneficiary, this must be the basis for a commercial transaction at arm’s length. However, if Alan is paying a premium on his policy which is not equal to the benefit he could expect from the arrangement, can you describe this as a commercial transaction? No. It is essential to ensure the amount paid by each participant reflects their expectation of benefiting from the arrangement. You can see there are significant business opportunities in share protection insurance. However, it is important to minimise inheritance tax not only on your client’s death but also on their spouse’s. It is this which is often overlooked.
All things considered, I think that the pension protection fund is unlikely to achieve anything at all but the closure of yet more final-salary pension schemes.
With the end of the tax year approaching, some investors are looking at novel schemes which seem to offer big returns but are they worth the risk?
In an exclusive interview with Money Marketing, Bell says Dublin’s increasing presence as a tax-efficient centre opens up opportunities for joint ventures rather than threatening the Isle of Man’s economy.
Using an investment wrapper set up by a life insurance company in a jurisdiction with a favourable tax regime, such as the Isle of Man or Dublin, opens up a wealth of planning opportunities. Investors benefit from growth that is largely free of tax as no tax is imposed on the income and gains in […]
George Osborne will make his last Budget speech of the current parliamentary term this week, and the early media briefings suggest that pensions will again feature heavily in that statement. So what are we able to learn from the weekend’s coverage?
- Top trends
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
FCA chief executive Andrew Bailey has used a speech at The Investment Association’s annual dinner to explain the regulator’s plans to make sure fees result in “sensible incentives” for fund managers. The regulator has put value for money in the spotlight with its Asset Management Market Study. The measures consulted on include getting more independent […]
Last week I was delighted to have the opportunity to talk about one of the most critical challenges for platforms over the next 5 to 10 years – whichhow do they need to evolve? And by ‘need’ – we frankly mean what’s required if platforms are genuinely to meet the needs of intermediaries and investors […]
Neil Woodford has upped his stake in Provident Financial as shares in the consumer credit company double from their August lows. According to a regulatory filing published late yesterday, the star fund manager increased his stake from 19.1 per cent to 20.1 per cent. Provident shares jumped 12 per cent on Friday morning when the […]