View more on these topics

Just 2% of customers take up pensions guidance, warns Royal London

Just 2 per cent of customers made contact with pension guidance service TPAS after being prompted by provider Royal London in wake-up packs sent over the last three months of 2014.

The poor take-up rate mirrors Legal & General’s guidance pilot last year, which also found only 1 in 50 people made contact after being told they could use the free service, stoking fears thousands will avoid guidance and regulated advice and make poor decisions following the introduction of new pension freedoms from April this year.

TPAS is delivering telephone support for the guidance, branded as Pension Wise, while Citizens Advice is running face-to-face service. The official Pension Wise website launched yesterday.

Commenting following the publication of the group’s new business results, Royal London group chief executive Phil Loney says: “Customers are not ready for the new pension freedoms, which have been thrown into place in an entirely unrealistic timescale.

“I fear that many will make the wrong, often irrecoverable decisions about their retirement and this will result in some very poor outcomes.”

Loney adds the FCA’s new ‘second line of defence’ rule, which will require ceding providers to ask a series of questions of retiring customers, “will not solve the problem”.

He adds: “George Osborne’s pension reforms have the potential to become famous for helping people to improve their retirement incomes but without plentiful and affordable financial advice they risk becoming an infamous example of political bungling.”

Royal London’s new life and pensions business sales were up 39 per cent year-on-year, from £3.46bn in 2013 up to £4.83bn in 2014.

Of that, group pension sales rose 83 per cent from £1.2bn in 2013 to £2.2bn in 2014, while new individuals pensions business grew by a quarter, from £1.1bn to £1.4bn. Drawdown sales surged 43 per cent, from £546m to £781m.

However, growth in the asset management business was slower than the previous year. There was £2bn of new business in 2014, down from £2.5bn in 2013.

Likewise, the Ascentric platform saw new assets dip 26 per cent year-on-year, from £1.7bn in 2013, to £1.2bn in 2014.

However, total group funds under management rose 12 per cent, from £73.5bn in 2013 up to £82.3bn in 2014.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. So ~ early indications are that the PGG may flop which, yet again, does rather suggest that a redeemable voucher system to visit an authorised intermediary might well have been a better mechanism. We’ll just have to wait and see

  2. A friend of mine works for one of the bigger building societies on the high street, he described to me a meeting he recently had with a member of the public. This guy had gone to the trouble to arrange an appointment with my friend in order to get some help completing the forms for an in house annuity purchase through his pension provider.

    Before helping complete the forms my friend pointed out that he would probably be able to get a better income if only he took some time to shop around. The response – “I can’t be bothered, I’ll just take what they are offering”.

    What can we do?

  3. A client came to me in 2012 wanting me just to sign the paperwork for him to buy an annuity in-house with Aviva, who wouldn’t accept the forms unless signed by a regulated adviser. He didn’t seem interested in whether Aviva’s rate was the best available, whether the structure of the annuity he was proposing to apply his fund to was the most suitable for his particular circumstances or discussing any possibly relevant health issues.

    Given that by signing the forms and accepting whatever commission would have been available would have rendered me liable for the suitability or otherwise of what he wanted to do, I refused unless he was prepared to engage with the full advice process (which might well have led to a recommendation to do something different. The FCA’s view on insistent clients is that there’s no such thing. So we went our separate ways and that was that.

    (Very) occasionally I wonder if he found another IFA to sign the forms for him, whether he decided at a later date that he’d not done the right thing and then……

    What next from the FCA? There’s no such thing as an Execution Only client?

Leave a comment