View more on these topics

Mike Bell: There is an alternative to equities

Cutting back on costs can lead to a challenging environment for risk assets

TINA, meaning “there is no alternative” to owning risk assets like credit and equities, has defined much of the current bull market. TINA wasn’t an accident, central banks purposefully sought to reduce the return available on safe assets to force investors into riskier investments, to lower borrowing costs and boost asset prices to support the economy.

While they achieved their goals, central bank actions also had unintended consequences. First, the rise in the value of financial assets – which are disproportionately held by the better-off – has contributed to wealth inequality. Some might argue that this inequality could be a factor behind some of the global political uncertainty that investors are currently contending with.

Second, while some housing markets corrected steeply, loose monetary policy allowed housing markets in some other parts of the world to rise to extended levels. Yet the biggest unintended consequence was that by keeping policy so loose for so long and pumping so much new money into the system, while they allowed the household sector in several key economies to reduce debt-to-GDP ratios, they also enabled corporates and governments around the world to increase their debt-to-GDP ratios.

The corporate leveraged loan market, for example, has seen a significant rise in leverage and a deterioration in covenant quality. Some auto loans have also gone to sub-prime borrowers. Neither of these markets are anywhere near as big as the mortgage market and most of the loans are not held by banks, so the risk to the banking system is much lower than in 2008 but investors who hold the lower quality versions of these loans should consider the risks involved.

Companies with investment-grade ratings have also increased their debt levels. Companies have taken advantage of cheap debt to buy other companies and to buy back their own shares, increasing debt-to-equity ratios. The risk is that as companies face rising wage costs and rising interest costs, as they refinance their debts, they might find themselves having to cut back on other costs. It’s the process of cutting back on costs that can lead to recessions and a more challenging environment for risk assets. Fewer share buybacks or reduced merger and acquisition activity could reduce the upward pressure on stock prices in coming years.

There is a risk that companies could also start to cut back spending on marketing, business investment and reduce headcount in an attempt to sustain their profits and avoid being downgraded. A more patient US Federal Reserve combined with Chinese policy stimulus will be needed to underpin corporate behaviour that supports growth.

Against this late cycle backdrop, investors might benefit from focusing on higher quality assets in the riskier part of their portfolios. For example, passive investments in credit indices – which favour the most indebted companies – could carry risks at this stage in the cycle. Likewise, equity investors might want to look for large, cheap, quality companies, which are the least vulnerable to the next downturn.

Today, TINA’s time is up, and there are now several viable alternatives available to investors to help them build a more balanced and diversified portfolio. US Treasuries, for example, look more attractive than they did a few years ago, when yields were much lower. US interest rates are probably more likely to be cut in the next few years than rise significantly further from here.

Even for non-US dollar investors, hedged medium- to long-dated Treasuries offer upside if US interest rates are cut during the next downturn. Most other major developed market government bonds offer less attractive yields and less room for rates to fall. While many emerging market government bonds offer high yields, some could be vulnerable if global growth deteriorates.

Beyond US Treasuries, the most attractive alternatives to risk assets can be found among the aptly named “alternative” strategies. In particular, those alternatives with a low correlation to risk assets look attractive at this late stage in the cycle.

Investors may therefore want to consider strategies such as global macro funds, some equity long/short funds and market-neutral funds, as well as defensive real assets like direct infrastructure investments, as some ways to add some balance to the riskier parts of their portfolios.

Mike Bell is global market strategist at JP Morgan Asset Management

Recommended

Tapering of annual allowance – adjusted and threshold income

The definitions of adjusted income and threshold income used to determine whether, and to what extent, someone’s annual allowance will be reduced can be confusing.  Here we try to make sense of it all. The annual allowance will be reduced for high income individuals from 6 April 2016.  Our previous article Tapering of annual allowance […]

Money-Cash-Coins-GBP-Pounds-UK-700x450.jpg
103

How much are advisers charging for pension transfers?

Defined benefit pension transfer charges are being put under the microscope again as the regulator turns over more potential conflicts of interest. With the British Steel Pension Scheme the latest to dominate headlines and the FCA ready to interrogate further as it extends its review to include all firms authorised to give pension transfer advice, […]

HSBC faces legal action from 400 investors over film tax scheme

Law firm Edwin Coe has commenced litigation on behalf of 400 investors against HSBC over its role in facilitating the operation of the Disney film financing investment scheme known as Eclipse. Money Marketing first reported that affected investors including celebrities and football managers were eyeing up a landmark legal challenge 18 months ago. The legal […]

8

Kim North: Why do white males still dominate marketing campaigns?

My favourite news story earlier this month came into my inbox from Money Marketing. The headline read: “Treasury pushes for gender diversity interventions after ‘slow’ progress.” Maybe it is because I am a female who has worked in financial services for over 35 years that the news resonated. Economic secretary to the Treasury John Glen […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I can hardly believe that this polemic is not only from a global market strategist, but one who is employed by one of the leading investment banks in the world.

    He start by telling us “….“there is no alternative” to owning risk assets like credit and equities” and then concludes by suggesting US Treasuries and global macro funds, some equity long/short funds and market-neutral funds, as well as defensive real assets like direct infrastructure investments. What does he think these are? Chopped liver?

    Anyway which of us can buy US Treasuries directly – even if we do complete a fatuous FACTA form? Or direct infrastructure investments, come to that.

    He also makes a nod to his ‘caring credentials’ – “…financial assets – which are disproportionately held by the better-off – has contributed to wealth inequality.” Yes of course financial assets are bought by the better off who invest in companies that provide employment. Without these investors how does he think these firms could thrive, pay tax and employ people? Wealth inequality is mainly down to ignorance and poor education.

    Then he makes other statements – “…cutting back on costs that can lead to recessions” and “…There is a risk that companies could also start to cut back spending”. Hey! Where do you live – ever heard of Brexit? That mess is already doing that. Even your employer is cutting back in the UK and shifting stuff abroad.

    In view of this should I get rid of any holdings I have in JP Morgan funds? This sort of thing doesn’t exactly engender confidence

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com