View more on these topics

John Malone: Brokers chance to fight fraud

The recently published Fraudscape report from Cifas – a not-for- profit organisation dedicated to preventing fraud – provides an insight into this issue based on the frauds recorded by more than 260 Cifas members in 2010.

The report contains a lot of interesting analysis but a question posed in the executive summary struck a chord. It asks: “What did we do to reduce fraud levels but more importantly what more do we do to battle whatever comes next?” We have learnt a lot by looking back but now we must look forward to try to be one step ahead of the fraudsters.

Mortgage lenders and product providers have improved systems and trained staff to be more aware of fraudulent activity. By sharing our experience with the police and trade bodies, levels of mortgage fraud reduced last year. The authorities can take some credit for making the public more aware of the dangers of identity fraud by highlighting action to secure their personal data.

However, a continuing cause for concern is the availability of fraudulent documentation such as pay slips and P60s. This is an issue that has been highlighted again recently in the trade media.

Measures could be introduced by lenders to formalise the verification of a person’s identity. This could mean only face-to-face meetings and mortgage submissions would be acceptable to the lenders. This significant change in the way mortgage business is submitted by a number of firms would be a big concern to their operations but could also have implications for the wider mortgage intermediary sector.

Maybe it is time to ask if it is in our profession’s long-term interests to accept every client at face value.

Mortgage intermediaries have an opportunity to take the initiative and raise the bar on standards. It is imperative we carry out thorough client due diligence and ensure all documentation is better verified, especially where an intermediary is engaging with the client at a distance.

In answer to the question posed above, the alternative is to wait for other parties to take the initiative, which could have more serious implications for the sector.

John Malone is executive chairman of PMS


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. As popular as this article will be amongst the lender community I wonder how many brokers are underwhelmed at reading yet another article from one of our “leaders” that fails to challenge the bigger issues such as dual pricing. As important as the points raised I just don’t believe they represent the worries and concerns of the broker community.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm