View more on these topics

John Lawson: The full cost of the charge cap


The DWP’s pension charge cap consultation proposes a range of charge cap options but it is far from clear at this stage what it is they plan to cap. More needs to be understood about transaction costs before we can conclude whether their inclusion or exclusion from a charge cap is the right decision. However, one thing is clear, once these costs are revealed advisers and clients will never look at funds the same way again.

The pension charges that are most visible are the annual management charge, or AMC, and the total expense ratio or TER. The former covers a wide range of pension provider or scheme costs, such as administration, fund management, marketing, commission and other sales costs. The TER adds registration, audit and depositary costs to the AMC.

What is currently invisible to advisers and the wider public are trading or transaction expenses, which are incurred in buying and selling the underlying assets of the fund. 

For most funds, these fall into three broad categories; brokerage, stamp duty and bid/ask spreads. These costs are reflected implicitly in the performance of the fund.

The size of these costs depends upon a wide range of factors but the most important is how regularly the fund is sold and repurchased. This is called the turnover rate. 

For example, if the cost of buying and repurchasing the whole fund is say 1.5 per cent, then the transaction cost will equal 1.5 per cent if the fund is turned over every year. But if the fund is turned over only once every 10 years, the annualised cost of turnover will be just 0.15 per cent
or 15 basis points.

The Investment Management Association has already published a code covering the disclosure of these costs for mutual (retail) funds. It expects investment managers covering over 96 per cent of retail funds to disclose these costs, mostly by the end of this year.

Life company funds, where most DC pension money is invested, will take longer to reach this standard, as accounting for these costs now takes place at the level of the life company rather than the fund. But insurers are expected to disclose these costs to the independent governance committees that will oversee contract-based pensions next year. Disclosing these expenses will allow all governors of investments, from advisers to trustees to individual customers to compare fund performance not just in nominal terms but also in terms of what is happening under the bonnet. Statistics will reveal the correlation or otherwise between fund performance and how frequently each fund trades.

Whether including these costs within a cap is a good thing or not is another matter. Pension schemes and providers may be prevented from trading when they want to because the cost of trades might force them over the cap. Others might conclude not trading at all is the best way to keep costs down, so the limited money raised from charges within the cap may be spent on other things such as communication.

To be transparent, it is vital that all involved, from contract-based providers, to trust-based DC schemes to discretionary managers all reveal their transaction costs to be measured by the same yardstick. Only then will we be able to make informed choices

John Lawson is head of policy at Aviva



Bonham Carter to step down from Jupiter chief exec role

Edward Bonham Carter is to step aside from his role as Jupiter group chief executive with Maarten Slendebroek taking over the position from next March. Bonham Carter will remain on the Board as vice chairman, reporting to Slendebroek. Slendebroek joined the Jupiter board last September as executive director responsible for distribution and strategy and was […]


Voyant and Plum integrate tech systems

Adviser software providers Voyant and Plum Software have announced an integration which allows advisers to transfer client data between the two. Voyant supplies planning tools including cashflow analysis, tax and estate planning, while Plum provides customer relationship software including client documentation, electronic valuations and regulatory reporting. The firms say the integration will improve efficiency by reducing […]


Scrapping ETF stamp duty “insufficient” to lure providers to UK

Firms are divided on whether the Chancellor’s move to axe the 0.5 per cent stamp duty paid by exchange traded funds will see more UK-based ETFs, with concern the may be “insufficient” to lure providers based abroad. Chancellor George Osborne announced in his Autumn Statement last week this tax will now be scrapped from April. The […]

Tax-free gains? That can’t be right, can it?

When he was Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne made several changes to the way in which income is taxed. Personal allowances were increased significantly above the rate of inflation; a starting rate band was introduced for savings income and, with effect from 6 April 2015, this was assessed at 0 per cent. In addition, […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm