View more on these topics

John Lawson: Industry left in limbo over pensions liberation


When people talk about pensions liberation, they appear to imply unauthorised payments or perhaps reciprocal loans. However, the problem has become much wider. Within the UK, we are now seeing increasingly sophisticated arrangements where some customers may end up with nothing at all.

This year, I estimate Aviva will stop £15m worth of suspect transfers covering over 600 customers, an eight-fold increase on 2012. Across the insurance industry alone, the numbers will be at least ten times this.

The pensions minister recently estimated that including occupational pensions schemes, £420m in total had been liberated. These are the ones the Government knows about, and does not include suspicious transfers to Qualifying Recognised Overseas Pension Schemes.

With pensions liberation reaching epidemic proportions, you might expect some tougher action from the Government and regulators? But that isn’t happening as quick as is needed. Instead, the pensions industry, both insurers and genuine trustees of occupational schemes, are left in limbo.

There have been initiatives such as the ‘Scorpion’ education and awareness materials, and HM Revenue & Customs now vets schemes before registration.

But equally, there has been procrastination. A recent court case that tested whether schemes were occupational pensions wasted months in the battle against these liberation practices.

Now the industry is being told not to be “over-enthusiastic” in stopping transfers because of the potential implications in denying customers the right to a transfer.

In some cases, we believe customers are facing high-pressure sales techniques to transfer. I genuinely believe many of these customers would not want to transfer to these schemes if they fully understood the financial consequences.

The vast majority of these cases are transfers to occupational pension schemes. Occupational schemes can be set up by anyone, unlike personal pensions which need a regulated firm behind them.

Although regulated individuals are not beyond scamming, at least they are governed by a regulator that will take swift action to curtail their activities. Applying to the FCA for authorisation is enough to put the scammers off. They do not want their name on a register and a regulator prepared to take tough action against them if they step out of line.

The problem lies with occupational pension schemes, and so the solution lies there too. Occupational schemes should need the equivalent of a regulated individual, in their case an independent trustee, involved before they can be established.

Large occupational pensions have long employed independent trustees because it is good practice to do so. Having an independent person on the trustee board reduces the possibility of conflicts of interest arising, whilst bringing external scrutiny and expertise.

Prior to pensions simplification, small self-administered pension schemes were required to have a ‘pensioneer’ trustee, to ensure the scheme performed its administrative duties properly. Many of the responsible operators in the SSAS community would welcome the return of independent trustees, as they have now realised that member trustees do not have the skills and knowledge required.

The involvement of an independent trustee would help stop both the routine use of unauthorised payments and the new forms of liberation which involve inappropriate investments.

The Pensions Regulator would need to maintain a register of independent trustees and ensure that every person allowed onto that register satisfied a ‘fit and proper’ test first.

This will come at a cost, but I see no reason why schemes, or indeed the independent trustees themselves, could not pay a registration fee.

John Lawson is head of policy at Aviva



RBS appoints law firm Clifford Chance to examine SME allegations

Royal Bank of Scotland has appointed law firm Clifford Chance to carry out an inquiry into allegations it put viable businesses into default so it could make more profit. The FCA and Prudential Regulation Authority were yesterday handed a report by Business Secretary Vince Cable, written by one of his key advisers Lawrence Tomlinson, containing the […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Interesting and sobering points…..

    I have been approached personally by a firm offering this and they made it clear that they were a marketing company.

    The same was said by the firm offering such a ‘solution’ in the Dispatches programme.

    I continue to say that a big part of solving many of the issues in Financial Services is ensuring consumers are aware to the existence of, and relevance of, regulation and regulated advisers.

    Liberation seems to continue and I have no doubt that many individuals are oblivious to the implications – both tax wise and investment wise.

  2. Is this a productive article or an Aviva trumpet blow on stopping transfers to liberation schemes?
    It was pretty pointless either way.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm