View more on these topics

John Greenwood: Releasing the costs

Could drawdown work through pre-vetted execution-only?  

John-Greenwood-MM-blog-side.jpg

Imagine a retiree in a labor-atory tank with a £75,000 pot, a £10,000 index-linked state pension and a mortgage-free home. If they were given the benefit of free ongoing advice from a panel of experts, would this hypothetical retiree be advised to buy a level annuity invested in 20-year gilts paying 2.65 per cent?

Obviously, it would depend on our guinea pig’s attitude to risk. But the long-term decline in annuity rates has meant that in a rising number of scenarios, the answer would be no.

As rates get worse, income drawdown by definition gets increasingly attractive for people, at least into their 70s. And Bank of England governor-designate Mark Carney is showing no signs of turning off the money supply tap, so a growing number of mass-market defined contribution retirees are finding themselves stuck between a rock and a hard place. Annuity rates are just above historic lows, yet the cost of doing drawdown properly is too high for them.

I was speaking recently with someone close to the Government’s consultation
on long-term care funding.

Accessing housing wealth through equity release is, not surprisingly, high on the agenda. But getting hold of that money is expensive under the current system, which involves costly and cumbersome legal and administrative outgoings.

Offering a streamlined approach that is given safe harbour on the basis that it is used purely for releasing equity to pay for long-term care is being talked about. This is one way of ensuring that someone releasing £30,000 of equity from their home does not lose £5,000 of it on fees. 

A similar problem exists for the mass market when it comes to drawdown. We already have a new breed of execution-only annuity advisers, vetted by an employer’s pension consultant, giving annuity purchasers pretty good outcomes. Could a mass-market, low-cost drawdown product ever be included in the process without full advice but through a pre-vetted execution-only process?

It is often said the annuity market is different because it is a discrete area with fairly simple choices. But what if you are on the borderline between annuity
and drawdown?

Buying an annuity is still a decision and carries risk. Yes, our economy may “do a Japan” but, equally, who is to say we will not see a repeat of the 25 per cent inflation of 1975 in the next 20 years?

With inflation at 2.8 per cent for the second month in a row, annuitants are investing in gilts that are currently not protecting the real-term value of their cash. A level annuity rate of 5.8 per cent for a 65-year-old with a life expectancy of 22 years not only barely pays back the original investment but, in the later years, the value of what is paid will have fallen in real terms by more than half, if the past two decades’ inflation is anything to go by.

The reason annuities are considered separately may be more down to the fact they can still be advised on through commission.

AllianceBernstein’s Retire-ment Bridge already offers an off-the-peg version of drawdown, taking on longevity risk in the investor’s 70s rather than their 60s. 

Will we see other providers target this growing DC at-retirement market with some form of diversified growth fund that is tailor-made for drawdown?

John Greenwood is editor
of Corporate Adviser

 

Recommended

3

Ageas Protect adds ‘life of another’ option to product range

Ageas Protect has added a “life of another” option to its existing product range, allowing customers who depend on another person financially to buy cover for that person if they need it. Customers will be able to choose whether the policy owner or the life assured pays the premium. Policies will offer access to the […]

Jupiter’s Merlin team cuts bond weightings

The Jupiter Merlin multi-manager team is slowly bringing its bond weightings down to the “absolute minimum” and increasing exposure to equities as they make a better inflation hedge than bonds. Jupiter multi-managers Algy Smith-Maxwell and Peter Lawery say the real rise in the cost of living is even higher than CPI and RPI rates. As […]

3

Neil Liversidge: Limiting the compensation culture

A number of separate debates have rumbled on in parallel over the past few years. Simplified products are a worthy enough concept but, owing to fears of misselling, never seem to take off. Meanwhile, caveat emptor raised its head again recently, only to be pushed firmly back down in the sands of time, where it belongs […]

US equity income: the standout market

By James Hackman, head of US Equities at Neptune With a growing dividend market, very low payout ratios and high dividend cover, the US is one of the standout equity income markets globally. It is also one of the most unloved. James Hackman, manager of the top-performing Neptune US Income Fund, highlights six key facts […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. John Greenwood seems to be suggesting that it costs £5,000 in fees to set up a £30,000 equity release plan. In my experience the cost should be in the order of £1,500.

Leave a comment