View more on these topics

John Greenwood: Prepare for wholesale pensions tax relief reform


I can understand why almost the entire financial services industry wants the Chancellor’s freedom and choice in pensions initiative to succeed. But I am surprised that nobody seems to want to talk about the apparent £10bn to £15bn hole it leaves in the public finances. Because as we saw with consultancy charging, burying heads in the sand only leads to more problems later down the line.

I too want the project to succeed. But I want it to do so on firm foundations. The way things are presently constructed, I do not believe the proposed structure will last a year.

The Treasury’s response to the freedom and choice consultation introduced a new measure to control recycling and limit the scope of sacrificing salary for pension. But by its own admission, it will only deter a tiny proportion of the nation’s over-55s from managing down their tax bill by opting to be paid more pension and less salary.

The Treasury document, in its desperation to show that it is not limiting the core principles of flexibility and freedom, says that a £10,000 annual allowance for triggering flexible drawdown will only impact 2 per cent of the working population.

This means that for 98 per cent of the population, the measures announced at the end of July are no deterrent whatsoever to them opting to be paid pension – with no employer or employee NI and 25 per cent tax-free – rather than the heavily-taxed salary route. Yes, they are limited to £10,000, but that is still pretty attractive, and for those with salary sacrifice and bonus sacrifice structures in place, it will be a no brainer.


Some industry figures had expected anti-avoidance measures to be introduced on top of the reduced annual allowance for those who go over their 25 per cent tax-free cash. The Treasury has confirmed that anti-avoidance rules will not be introduced – instead saying it will keep out a watching brief for individuals exploiting the new rules for unintended tax advantages.

But given we have no idea what these are, what are pension advisers supposed to do? All we can do is accept what the Chancellor told the nation in his Budget speech, and has subsequently clarified in its consultation response, namely that individuals over 55 can receive £10,000 into a pension and draw it out immediately, a quarter of it tax free. So surely this is what a good adviser should tell its clients.

This is costly for the Government. For every basic-rate taxpayer currently not paying into pension that does that, the Treasury loses £3,080, made up of £1,380 employer NI, £1,200 employee NI and £500 income tax. For 40 per cent taxpayers, the figure is £3,580. Yes, some will be paying some pension contributions already, although pre-auto-enrolment the majority were not, and since then most have come in on 1 plus 1 per cent.

So if we assume there are probably around 5 million workers over age 55 – there are already more than a million over state pension age – then its not fanciful to calculate the amount of tax at risk from this policy being somewhere between £10bn and £15bn. Obviously not all will take the option, but even if one in 10 do, that is a lot of money lost by the Treasury. And it would pretty much obliterate the extra revenue from people cashing in pots – £320m in 2015/16 rising to £1.2bn in 2018/19 and then falling back to £300m the following year.

This is clearly not going to be allowed to happen – the country simply cannot afford it. So rather than put things in place and undo them later on, why not be honest with ourselves and get some clarity in place now? My suspicion is, because its too complicated. The Chancellor has promised the earth and this is an elastoplast solution to get us past the next election, at which point there will be wholescale and severe changes to the way pensions are funded through tax relief.

When it comes to pensions tax relief, advisers are always telling clients to make hay while the sun shines. If the Chancellor said you can do it in the Budget and following documents, surely it must be okay.

John Greenwood is editor of Corporate Adviser



Ratings agency raises concerns over FundsNetwork transparency

Ratings and actuarial agency AKG has questioned the transparency of the Fidelity FundsNetwork ownership structure. FundsNetwork is legally owned by the Bermuda-domiciled FIL Ltd, which AKG says is not in line with practices of other platforms in the market. The latest FundsNetwork AKG financial report rates the platform as a “B”. AKG says: “Having a Bermuda […]

Wayman-Caroline-FOS-2013 700 x 450.jpg

FOS names new chief executive

The Financial Ombudsman Service has appointed Caroline Wayman as chief executive and chief ombudsman. Wayman has been with the FOS since 2000 and is currently principal ombudsman and legal director. She previously worked in the insurance sector and is a barrister by training. She has become chief executive with immediate effect. Deputy chief executive Tony […]


RBS to pay £17m bonus to controversial GRG unit

Royal Bank of Scotland is paying out bonuses worth £17m to its controversial Global Restructuring Group division, despite the business still being under investigation by the FCA. The Sunday Times reports it has seen documents which show RBS has approved bonuses for GRG based on 2013 performance, despite claims it deliberately forced small businesses into default […]


FCA brings criminal case over unauthorised investment scheme

The FCA has commenced a criminal prosecution against Phillip Boakes for operating an unauthorised investment scheme. Boakes faces 13 charges, including six counts of fraud, for operating a scheme that claimed to carry out foreign exchange trading for the benefit of its investors. The alleged offences relate to Boakes’ company Currencytrader Limited, which he operated […]

When is £1m not £1m?

Neil Jones is technical support manager with Canada Life’s ican Technical Services Team. Canada Life offers a range of wealth management solutions, including retirement income planning, estate planning and investment solutions from a choice of jurisdictions, including the UK, Isle of Man and Republic of Ireland. The residential nil-rate band (RNRB) was first announced in […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. John. Not sure I follow the logic. If individuals are making personal contributions it will either be from savings accrued from income that will have “suffered” income tac and NI or from an inheritance or similar windfall which may or may not have been taxed. If it is through salary sacrifice, £8000 may be too large an amount for many to give up in lieu of the £2500 tax free sum that can be drawn against that contribution (£8000 will net down to about £5300 after basic rate tax and NICs). However I do feel tax relief will be targetted rather than the PCLS which can currently be taken tax free. Individuals will also need to have relevant income in order to offset. So retirees wishing to take advantage of the situation will not be able to do so unless I’ve missed something.

  2. The Chancellor isn’t concerned about the black-hole. He is focussed, entirely, on doing everything to maximise the Conservative Party chances at the next election.

    By the time the £10/15bn problem rears its head it’ll be SEP. (Someone elses problem)

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm