View more on these topics

John Greenwood: Pension reforms will be bad for auto-enrolment

Low and medium earners stand to lose out under pension reforms

The single tier pension is meant to be good for auto-enrolment. In fact, it is meant to be essential if the government is not to be sued for misselling.

Yet the way the DWP’s flat rate pension White Paper addresses the problem creates more problems for the auto-enrolment target market than it solves. Few would attack the Government for bringing the income of millions of women, self-employed and those with poor contribution records up to the level of a decent pension.

But where the plan falls down is the over-generous approach to solving the contracting out conundrum, which buys the support of defined benefit members, mainly in public sector unions, at the expense of the great unpensioned.

That those who have contracted out do better is irrefutable. If you have contracted out and still have 10 years to retirement when the single tier pension comes in, you can get the same pension as someone who stayed in, and still get to keep your contracted out pot which can be worth anything up to £100,000.

Those in defined benefit schemes can also benefit, building up an extra couple of grand of state pension for extra NI contributions as low as £250.

But the pension reforms are supposed to be about helping those without pensions.

The auto-enrolment target market, by contrast, is full of people who have never contracted out. We all expected the abolition of S2P to hit contracted-in high earners. Yet it turns out low earners who stay contracted into the state scheme lose out under the changes.

You would not know this by looking at the White Paper, however, as nowhere does it say what different income groups could expect from S2P after 30 or 40 years in the system.

It gives the impression the Government is relying on the very complexity of state pension provision to push through changes without the public knowing. Figures the DWP gave me a couple of years ago stated a low earner, on £14,200, reaching state pension age in 2025 could expect state second pension of £2,444, rising to £2,860 in 2035. Add basic state pension and that would give an income of £500 a year more than the flat rate pension in 2025, which they will now lose.

Medium-earners on £25,800 are nearer £2,000 a year worse off. The impact assessment points out auto-enrolment will help those who lose out on the abolition of state second pension. But even if low and medium earners are automatically enrolled into an 8 per cent combined scheme today – then by 2035 their auto-enrolment income will have only just offset the state pension they will have lost, leaving them £125 and £595 a year off respectively.

Is this really what the DWP intended? Because the great unpensioned do not have a union, they are being cut out of this massive state pension carve up. If this state pension reform passes unamended, auto-enrolment will have made many of the low paid worse off.

John Greenwood is editor of Corporate Adviser

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Well done for high lighting this John.

  2. Am I right in thinking that the politicians are one of the biggest winners out of the proposed state pension changes? Is their pension scheme not contracted out?

    If this is the case, surely there should be a law that stops MPs changing legislation in a way that will benefit them unless they set out very clearly the figures on how they might benefit. Otherwise it is a clear conflict of interest.

  3. Just add this to the ever lengthening list of disadvantages. The Government has moved partially in the right direction, but refuses to get right into the water and swim.
    If pensions for the population are a concern – then the State should provide. Stop fooling around and outsourcing this to employers and private providers. If tax needs to be increased – so be it. If you need to create a Sovereign Wealth fund to fund the system instead of the useless PAYG system – then get to it. The first asset in the fund could be the banks that are in effect already a National Asset (liability?) Amalgamate the Winter Fuel allowance into the State Pension; all the money that is wasted in Foreign Aid could be included – after all charity begins at home. There is quite a list of savings and additions, if only those in Westminster were genuine in their concern. Just ask Ros Altman if you need help!

  4. Harry Katz some good points, but please take some time out to educate yourself on the purposes of foreign aid which translate into mutual global benefits from somewhere other than the Daily Mail etc.. It has often been misused but that is a criticism of the application in these areas rather than the whole. It also costs us all less than £4 a week each which is a pint of lager and a packet of crisps for goodness sake!

  5. Just goes to demonstrate that HM Gov are not above a bit of cooking the books in their favour and not above ripping off the public with this massive con trick
    All they actually needed to do is raise Employer and Employee NI and divert that to S2P

    Wonder why they didn’t do that.?

    This government has all its priorities wrong, giving billions of our money in aid to foreign governments who don’t use it properly as it was intended, or simply steal it and then saying we will all have to work longer and harder for the miserable income in retirement they deem it necessary to subsist on.

    No wonder this country is in deficit, stop giving our taxes away and concentrate on our own issues.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com