View more on these topics

John Greenwood: Make broker annuity referral the default for DC

John Greenwood MM blog

‘Commission to the rescue in annuity market’ may not be the headline any of the political parties would want themselves associated with but a consensus appears to be emerging that commission-paid intermediaries could be the solution to the car crash that is the current at-retirement process.

It is ironic that after all the flak commission-based advisers have received from the authorities over the years, they are increasingly being seen as the solution to the biggest financial advice challenge most people will ever face.

Those that have survived RDR annihilation by hiding in the untroubled corner of the intermediary market that is the annuity sector are potential saviours of the millions of future DC retirees.

The ABI code of conduct, which is due to take effect next spring, should improve outcomes for retirees by improving the information available to them, emphasising the financial gains available to those that shop around and the removal of home provider application forms from pre-retirement mailouts.

While a welcome step, nobody expects this to lead to a situation where virtually everyone gets something approaching the right annuity for their situation. That’s good news for people like me who will still be able to get paid for writing stories about how poor value many people’s annuities are, even if I think annuities themselves can be good value. But it’s less good for the people who end up seeing out their days with the wrong annuity – and worse still for those surviving spouses who end up with nothing.

The fact is we are within touching distance of eradicating the Sunday supplement annuity-knocking open market option story at a stroke, and giving most people the retirement income they deserve. What’s more, this at-retirement Holy Grail is achievable with no outlay from government and could be put in place pretty quickly.

I’m talking about the idea of making referral to a pre-vetted independent annuity broker the default position for all DC retirees. People could choose not to take the services offered to them and opt back into their provider’s low value annuity if they want, but make the starting point that they do not.

I was first told about the idea a year ago by Dr Debbie Harrison of the Pensions Institute, at the publication of an NAPF review of the annuity market. Twelve months on, the publication of another NAPF report into annuities, Supporting DC Savers At Retirement, has prompted Labour pension shadow Gregg McClymont to call for pension schemes to be given a duty to direct their savers to the best independent annuity brokerage service available or to offer such independent brokerage services themselves.

Currently, many DC members do get access to execution-only services from brokers, regardless of fund size, because the broker has been made to agree to take all-comers.

But it is generally in the area of smaller schemes where retirees are falling through the cracks. The NAPF’s report highlights a number of barriers to smaller schemes, most notably fear of stepping over a regulatory line into advice. If the government made the OMO the default, they would not only have no reason not to act, but they would not be able to fail to act in their members’ best interests.

The NAPF says it is considering looking at a establishing a register of approved brokers, or the development of a master-brokerage. Both of these moves are steps in the right direction, but without mandatory intermediation there will still be individuals falling through the cracks.

It should not be too difficult for the government or the industry to oversee the establishment of a panel of pre-approved at-retirement specialists. Most people would be guided through an execution-only process, usually with telephone assistance, but there would need to be safeguards built in to make sure those who needed full advice got it. The different non-annuity options available would all have to be given equal weighting.

Such a project could lead to vastly improved outcomes being achieved very quickly. What’s more, the government might even see its welfare bill reduced through more cash going to funding savers’ retirements and less leaking into life office coffers. 

John Greenwood is editor at Corporate Adviser 

Recommended

1

FCA pledges better updates for whistleblowers

The Financial Conduct Authority says it will do more to keep whistleblowers in the loop when they pass on information. Speaking at an FCA financial crime conference in London today, FCA director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott said she understands the frustration among firms who report their suspicions and then do not know […]

Barclays to cut 750 ING Direct roles

Barclays is making 750 ING Direct roles redundant after it acquired the provider’s mortgage and savings books. In April, Money Marketing revealed Barclays had placed the staff on a 90-day consultation after completing a deal to acquire ING’s £10.9bn deposit book and £5.6bn mortgage book in February. The consultation has now ended and staff have […]

FundsNetwork in talks to outsource back office technology

Fidelity Fundsnetwork is in talks to outsource its back office platform technology. Money Marketing understands the platform has been in talks with Bravura Solutions among other firms over a deal. Yesterday, Royal London-owned wrap Ascentric announced it had signed a software deal with Bravura. The deal sees Bravura provide the back office technology for both the […]

LV= recruits former Aviva director to drive life product marketing

LV= has appointed Victoria Wentworth as brand and life marketing director. She joins the mutual insurer from Aviva, where she was international customer strategy director. In her new role, Wentworth will be responsible for the overall marketing strategy for LV=’s life products. LV= life and pensions managing director Richard Rowney says: “As a result of […]

William Littlewood “betting that QE won’t work”

Journalist Alexis Xydias interviews Artemis manager William Littlewood about his views on bond, equity and currency markets and the impact of a Greek exit from the EU. With bond yields at “ludicrous” levels, William believes a tipping point for bond markets is sure to come. As a result, his Strategic Assets Fund holds government bond shorts to the tune of 100 per […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Exasperated Me 4th July 2013 at 4:08 pm

    One ‘broker’ with Berkeley in its name used to sell Scottish Life annuities despite the fact that they were not even in the top five in comparisons, why?

    Ask the regulator who took many years to catch up despite many warnings from firms.

  2. Car crash is about right. There are two major problems, first, regardless of the bunkum spouted by ABI probably 60% plus don’t shop around and second, those that do often either get sold the wrong product or get bad advice! With the vast majority of people entering retirement taking a single life level conventional annuity, where, currently based on average life expectancy you will not even get your fund back. When inflation does take hold again, which it will I would not be surprised if we see a return to the Poor House in the not too distant future.

  3. Billy Burrows 9th July 2013 at 5:27 pm

    John

    I like your choice of words – The fact is we are within touching distance of eradicating the Sunday supplement annuity-knocking open market option story at a stroke, and giving most people the retirement income they deserve.

    I would rephrase this to read – we are solving one problem only to sleep walk into another problem – those in the know argue that annuities are poor value for many but the industry is still telling people to buy them

    We need to find a way of explaing that there is more choice and if an annuity has to pay out for the next 25 / 30 years a longer term approach to annuities needs to be considered.

    As Keynes said “In the long run we are all dead” but in the long run a level annuity will be worth much less after allowing for inflation

  4. Now if that is the same Dr Debbie Harrison of the Pensions Institute as the Dr Debbie Harrison formerly of the CASS Business school, writer if several books on FS and more importantly the person who write a glowing review of aKeydata’s Life Settlement Plans, whilst she appears a very nice and credible person, why is she not speaking to the Court and why is Esra Moitra not doing so about Key data and pointing out how unjust the pursuit of ALL advisers by the FSCS has been?

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com