View more on these topics

John Greenwood: IBM’s pension portal plans deserve airtime

IBM’s plan for a national citizen’s pension portal is an exciting idea. The goal of a single screen showing all an individual’s pensions, whether they are state, personal or occupational, is a compelling objective.

Done right, it could also answer many of the Government’s questions over small pots, member engagement and the public’s attitude to long-term savings. And it could even facilitate more cost-effective delivery of RDR advice.

The concept is gaining support in many parts of the industry although resistance to it is fierce in some quarters.

There are two reasons for this resistance. First, the radical nature of what is proposed. IBM wants to create an aggregated view of all state and private pensions housed in a portal offering educational tools designed to increase consumer engagement, facilitate consumerinitiated transfers and boost competition in the market.
For closed book players, this would potentially open the prison gates to billions of pounds worth of assets currently locked up through inertia. This argument against IBM’s portal plan is unlikely to worry policymakers and rightly so.

The second reason for opposition is a belief that it is an attempt to water down the Government’s zeal for reform on the question of small pots.

Several of the providers which support the portal proposal are, I believe, among those who do not like the idea of the “pot follows member” option in the Government’s small pot consultation. I understand the suspicions of those concerned but only to an extent.

If the portal was in place today, then two of the objectives of the small pots consultation, that of an overall view of their pension savings and easier transfers, would already be met. No need, therefore, one might argue, to proceed with anything as drastic as small or any pot follows member.

But the IBM proposal does not of itself preclude mandatory amalgamation of small pots. In fact, it could be a relatively quick way to get to a point where we have the connectivity where small pots can quickly and effectively be merged.

Australia, which is 20 years down the line with dealing with compulsion, is a case in point. There is a website where Australians can go and see all their Super-funds in one place, a concept not a million miles from what IBM is proposing. But the Australian experience is that, like so many other well meaning yet on the face of it dull websites, nobody uses it.

That is why from next year it is introducing auto-consolidation, which will aggregate small funds that have not been touched for two years unless the individual specifically requests they remain separate

You could say the Australian experience shows why we need to go straight to an aggregator or pot follows member option.

Maybe we do but the added benefit of the national pension portal is that it would, given the right Government backing, be able to cover legacy pensions as well as occupational and state pension too. Whatever advice models emerge after the RDR, it will be far easier to service those on middle incomes if all their information is visible in one place at the first meeting with the adviser.

The industry does not necessarily face an either/or question here. IBM seems to think it can deliver this consumer pensions portal relatively quickly. Yes, there will be issues to iron out along the way but it is an idea that deserves some air time.

John Greenwood is editor of Corporate Adviser

Recommended

ING now wants income proof from 68

ING Direct is now requiring evidence of post-retirement income from borrowers whose mortgage term extends beyond age 68. Previously, the company would conduct a mortgage affordability assessment based on current income up to 75, as long as the mortgage was paid off in full by then. Now if the mortgage term extends beyond 68, evidence […]

ABI backs save more tomorrow

The Government is being urged to encourage development of pension schemes which automatically increase future employee contributions above the automatic enrolment minimum. Standard Life has advocated “save more tomorrow” schemes as an extension to auto-enrolment. A person commits to putting more money into their pension as their wages increase. In a panel debate at the […]

M&S adds mortgages with banking move

Marks & Spencer is to offer mortgages in its plan to set up a bank with a network of 50 branches in store over the next two years. The first M&S branch will open next month in the flagship retail store at Marble Arch, London. M&S Bank branches will all be in stores and will […]

O’Donnell wants levy for Treasury work

Former Cabinet Secretary Lord Gus O’Donnell says the Treasury should consider levying financial services firms to fund its work in the financial sector. Giving his first speech as a peer during this week’s Lords debate on the Financial Services Bill, O’Donnell said the Treasury is in danger of being “swamped” by its workload. He suggested […]

International jurisdictions

By Neil Jones, Canada Life Investing through international providers has grown in popularity over recent years as investors seek out the benefits of gross roll-up and the wider range of investment options that can be available. When considering a recommendation for a lump sum investment, not only does the adviser have to select a suitable tax wrapper […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. There is likely to be resistance from the government.

    The State pensions (basic and S2P) are unfunded, and based on a giant ponzi-scheme. There are no funds to look at, just whatever the (latest) promise from the government happens to be.

    A portal would illuminate how this is a moving feast, with retirement ages moving upwards on a regular basis, and other changes such as the ending of the Graduated pension scheme, SERPS (into S2P) and of course the latest scheme to merge Basic and S2P into one scheme.

    And what about members of unfunded Public Sector schemes? Their occupation schemes would have identical issues.

    Nice idea. It will never work in practice though.

  2. Why do people use the Australian system as some shining beacon when they will admit themselves that the level of pension saving actually fell as a result of compulsion.

    Comparing the Australian system with the British system is like comparing apples and pears.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com