View more on these topics

John Greenwood: Has OFT created RDR 2 for corporate advisers?

John-Greenwood-MM-Peach-700x450.jpg

It really is the end of the world as we know it, for formerly commission-based advisers at least.

The Office of Fair Trading’s report into defined contribution pensions has delivered a damning indictment on certain parts of the industry and its recommendations on commission will have far-reaching ramifications for the corporate advice sector.

The OFT’s report has driven a coach and horses through the plans of many corporate IFAs who had thought they had sorted out their transition from RDR to fees and were gearing themselves up for auto-enrolment.

For them the message remains the same – an urgent need to retool their business to become auto-enrolment implementers, including a switch to deriving non-regulated income from white-labelling software to employers. But the urgency of making that change is now amplified several times over.

There is no point advisers deluding themselves. There is a real chance that all commission on group pensions, not just new joiners and increments, will be turned off in the coming months.

This would be a complete U-turn on the FSA’s earlier proclamation that commission on schemes set up before the RDR could continue. But the OFT has got the bit between its teeth and recent statements from the Department for Work and Pensions point to more intervention rather than less.

Some experts predict the tap could be turned off by next April. If that is the case, we can expect a rapid shakedown and some firms will probably go to the wall.

The argument that such a move would make no sense at a time when the country has such a high need for pensions advice will hold no sway. With tens of thousands of firms staging next year, the impact that the loss of a few small corporate IFAs would have had would be minimal from the DWP’s perspective. And the minister would be correct in arguing that the professionals involved would soon move to other organisations that were not set up on a fee basis, so expertise would not be lost.

The OFT’s recommendations leave many questions and it will be several months before we know how far a commission ban will go. Untangling all that has been put in place will be a massive task. The big question will be who will benefit from the ending of commission, providers or consumers?

Take the scheme in my workplace. It was rebroked recently to a 0.3 per cent active member charge, rising to 0.7 per cent for former employees. Previously the scheme had been 0.5 per cent across the board. Will the scheme revert to 0.5 per cent for all, in which case my employer has got to go through a process of communicating the increase in charges to the workforce. Who will pay for overseeing the change? And what happens to the money the life office would have paid in trail and on future increments?

Presumably this will just be kept by the insurer. It has been suggested that life offices will have to cut their prices to remain competitive and avoid schemes being rebroked, but with so much else going on with auto-enrolment, I won’t be holding my breath.

There are many ironies and paradoxes in the OFT’s recommendations, which to be fair reflect the paradoxes in the group pensions space. My employer’s active member discount of 0.7 per cent is not OK, while a legacy scheme of 1 per cent is OK. So is a 1 per cent charge for anyone in Nest for the last five years of their working life or a trust-based scheme with a monthly administration charge for departing members.

And while I can enjoy a 0.3 per cent charge as an active member, this scheme is not acceptable to the OFT because my employer’s adviser has no incentive to shop around for a better deal.

The OFT has effectively laid an RDR Mark II onto the industry. Its recommendations will doubtless lead to better outcomes for savers over the long run. But given the capacity crunch facing the industry in the coming months, surely all this should have been done years ago. As it is, it looks like we are in for a second successive Christmas wondering how the industry is meant to operate.

John Greenwood is editor of Corporate Adviser

Recommended

Santander-700x450.jpg

Santander plans 70% increase in mortgage lending next year

Santander intends to lend up to £25bn next year, a 70 per cent increase on its 2012 lending, Money Marketing understands. Over the past two years the Spanish bank has been conducting a huge deleveraging exercise which saw its balance sheet shrink from roughly £173bn in 2011 to around £150bn now. This led to its […]

Rob-Reid-MM-Peach-700.jpg
4

Rob Reid: Warning signs missed over AE charging impact

The combination of the banning of consultancy charging and the OFT call to ban commission-based products will wreck many a strategy for auto enrolment, especially for cold storage schemes. By cold storage I refer to those schemes set up pre-RDR on indemnity terms not just for the small number of initial members but with the […]

Ingram-David-PFS

PFS appoints David Ingram as president

The Personal Finance Society has appointed Aim Two Three partner David Ingram as president. Ingram succeeds HK Wealth Managers managing director Garry Hale in the role. Phoenix Temple Wealth Management’s Brendan O’Ciobhain has also been named as vice president, while Chadney Bulgin joint managing partner David Thomas retains his vice presidency. Ingram says: “Garry Hale […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I don’t know about RDR 2 but it is as clear as daylight that the whole purpose of this is to ensure that as many schemes as possible end up in NEST – sooner or later so those in power can say “What a resounding success” it was.

    Smaller employers simply won’t be able to pay the fees that we will need to do this type of business profitably, taking into account of our potential risk, cover all regulatory fees and PI etc. We will stop advising in this area and they will end up DIY into NEST. This is their end goal regardless of the high charges during the first 10 years.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com