View more on these topics

Jane Vass: Govt needs to set minimum standards for pensions

The Government needs to ensure that all pension schemes meet minimum standards to ensure nobody loses out through automatic pension transfers.


Last week has seen a flurry of policy activity around private pensions.

The Government set out its proposals for how to deal with the estimated 50 million dormant pension pots that are expected to be created by auto enrolment and the Work and Pensions committee made its recommendations on how to improve best practice in workplace pensions, including their view on the favoured Government approach of pot-follows-member.

Like the committee, we support the Government’s intention to tackle the problem of small pension pots – 23 per cent of the people we asked recently had lost track of at least one of their pension pots, never mind how difficult it can be to convert small pots into annuities.

But we’ve always been concerned that a pot-follows-member system would leave too much room for members to lose out, for example if their pot went from a scheme with low charges to one with higher ones.

The problem is not just about charges – important though they are.

What about the quality of the scheme governance? How good is the default investment fund? And, what can sometimes be forgotten as it may seem so far off, how good is the information members receive when they come to make choices about drawing their pension?

This is why we have been arguing for the adoption of minimum standards for schemes that are able to participate in any automatic transfer system, to ensure people do not lose out as their hard-earned pension pots move from one scheme to another.

In fact, the same standards should apply to existing savers, not just new ones.

Although it is good news that average charges have fallen, it is not enough to just have a good average and we must not forget those outlier or legacy schemes that still have unreasonably high charges.

Access to good schemes that meet minimum quality standards should be available to everybody, not just those who are lucky enough to work for employers who make the effort and have the bargaining power to secure the best deals.

The legal framework in the forthcoming Pensions Bill will permit the Government to specify standards for automatic transfer schemes, with any actual standards set out in subsequent regulations.

We will be looking for the Government to set out unequivocally in regulations clear standards on: low, fair and transparent charges; good governance; high-quality information; and, investment options that meet the needs of members.

Jane Vass is head of public policy at Age UK


Tony Wickenden: Discounted gift trusts rules remain intact

The new GAAR guidance notes were published recently. In the examples on inheritance tax was confirmation that Discounted Gift Trusts will not be attacked under the GAAR. That DGTs were used as a specific example is, as it has turned out, a very good thing. HMRC stated at the beginning of the example on DGTs […]


Former mortgage broker to stand trial

A former mortgage broker has been ordered to stand trial over allegations of conducting regulated business when unauthorised and assisting fraud by false representation. Michael Joseph James Lewis has been committed for trial at Maidstone Crown Court over 13 counts of conducting regulated business when unauthorised and three counts of assisting a fraud by false representation. […]


Nest challenges companies over executive pay

Government-backed pension scheme the National Employment Savings Trust has set out plans to challenge the companies it invests in over executive pay, the appointment of auditors and the diversity of board membership. Nest began accepting contributions from pension investors in July last year. It is eventually expected to become one of the largest institutional asset […]

Halifax to pay FTB stamp duty on homes up to £250k

Halifax Intermediaries has offered to pay full stamp duty bills for first-time buyers on properties worth up to £250,000.The deal will run until 7 July and applies to a 60 per cent LTV two-year fix at 2.54 per cent and an 85 per cent LTV two-year fix at 3.84 per cent.Halifax Intermediaries head of sales […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. The more I think about it, the more I think NEST should be the only auto enrolment option with an advised GPP run alongside where felt appropriate by the employer and adviser. It protects those wh o don’t seek advice from liberators and from short term small lots as NEST follows the NI number. We are an advisory firm, but didn’t want lots of paid up GPP pots, so NEST makes sense for auto enrolment for low volatility investments as we can then manage expectations and a GPP advised for excess monies for an employee if we want and look at assets allocation ACROSS products. The providers don’t want lots of small pots, so who does?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm