The subject in question is that of stakeholder savings products and the launch, a fortnight ago, of the Government’s “new” campaign aimed at encouraging people to take one out.Working on the assumption that we are all comp- letely stupid, the Department for Work and Pensions felt the need to assert that its exciting slogan, Stakeholder Saving – It All Adds Up, aims to “build on the success” of its stakeholder initiative. According to my copy of the Oxford English Dictionary, “success” means “the accomplishment of an aim or purpose”. How close is this definition to the Government’s claim that stakeholder products are a “success”? Not very close at all, actually. The latest figures from the ABI show that so-called annual premium equivalent sales, which measure the total of all monthly contributions made in a year plus 10 per cent of all single payments, were just 92m in the second quarter of this year. That is a staggeringly low figure – the equivalent of a few pounds per individual invested in a stakeholder pension. That is not the full story, either. Earlier research from the ABI shows that while up to one-and-a-half million stakeholder pensions have been set up, most of them through workplace schemes, the majority are shells into which no payments are made. Conversely, the average size of monthly contributions is more than 150 – much higher than the amount that the savers the Government is hoping to attract into pension saving could realistically afford. What is also not clear is the extent to which stakeholder pensions are simply syphoning away money that would otherwise have been going into some other savings product. Bearing in mind the poor response rate to stakeholder products so far, you would imagine that any campaign aimed at encouraging greater take-up of them would be massive. Just think of the huge publicity blasts from all the main political parties when they were scrapping with each other during the general election. Yet, when it comes to promoting its wonderful savings scheme, the DWP is spending a mere 10m on the campaign, which includes TV slots, newspaper adverts and leaflets through doors. This is an insignificant amount, certainly when compared with the vast budgets spent each year by car and washing powder manufacturers when marketing their products to the general public. It is hard to believe that more than a few thousand people will respond to this feeble attempt to persuade us to save more. In turn, this publicity campaign may become known as the most expensive in the history of marketing in terms of advertising response rates. If 100,000 new plans were taken out, the cost would be 100 each and I cannot believe that even a fraction of that number will be motivated to start one. The only thing that saves the Government on its stakeholder products is its “success” over child trust funds. Here, stakeholder CTFs are said to account for between 50 and 70 per cent of all policies sold since their launch in April. Given that the 250 in CTF vouchers being handed out to each child born after September 2002 is seen as “free” money by parents investing it, that is hardly surprising. But even with CTFs, more than half of parents with children who are eligible for them have failed to set one up, according to research last week. Just 41 per cent of parents who have received their vouchers from the Government have opened a CTF for their kids. The plain fact is that, notwithstanding ludicrous claims of success, the Treasury’s stakeholder initiative increasingly looks to be dead in the water. Hardly surprising, really. Despite all its huffing and puffing, the Government has always been half-hearted about stakeholder products. Proof of that can be seen in the flawed charging structure for these products. The current regime allows companies to charge up to 1.5 per cent of a fund’s value for the first 10 years of its life, reverting to 1 per cent. This new charge cap was actually raised from an initial 1 per cent after protests from the industry that IFAs were unwilling to recommend stakeholder products unless commission was raised. The difficulty here is that 1.5 per cent is hardly better. It would be far better to allow up to 3 per cent or even 4 per cent as an initial payment to advisers for recommending on all contributions and then keep the annual cap at 1 per cent or lower. So what we have is a half-hearted Government marketing campaign on behalf of a product that advisers refuse to sell, to consumers who refuse to buy it. It could only happen under New Labour. So there I was last week, trolling through Headlinemoney, the journalists’ personal finance news website, when I read that Aifa has just appointed a new head of marketing, Rebecca Pratley. Rebecca was quoted as saying: “Aifa provides an important service to the IFA community. It’s exciting to join such an influential, highly regarded team and build on their success.” Think about it.
Compliance.co.uk has bought Compliance Consultants.
As you are probably aware,Lazard have now become part of the Fidelity Funds Network which, you might reasonably think, requires no action on the part of either us or our clients other than to consider the vastly wider range of funds now available. Not so. Crazy though it may seem in respect of investments made […]
Equitable Life has dropped its 700m High Court claim against its former auditor Ernst & Young and faces a 30m legal bill. In what E&Y barrister Mark Hapgood called “the biggest climbdown in English legal history”, Equitable dropped its claim – originally for 2.6bn – after the evidence of former directors blew the society’s case […]
Those Lanson girls really are eager. Ex-Money Marketing hack now at the Daily Mail James Coney got a pleasant call from a Lansonette with a press release which she described as being “really relevant at the moment”. Was it on the subject of the party political conferences taking place over the next few weeks, the […]
Martin Foden, head of credit research at Royal London Asset Management, explores the role of secured bonds, considering the impact of default and the characteristics of secured bonds versus supranationals and highlighting some examples. He also examines the evolution of the credit market and rating agency inefficiencies. Read the article in full: The value of […]
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
Another investment manager offering enterprise investment schemes has alerted clients of a 10 per cent drop in value for one of its portfolios following new Mifid rules. Mifid II, which came into force on 3 January, requires firms to notify clients when the overall value of their portfolio, relative to its value at the beginning of each reporting […]
The recent enquiry by the work and pensions select committee has reignited the debate about the future of collective defined contribution schemes. Whether these sort of schemes can be incorporated into the current UK pensions landscape is a moot point. Let’s consider some of the arguments for and against CDC. First of all, it is […]
Retirement interest-only mortgages are set to become more popular following the FCA removing hurdles to selling them. The regulator sees RIO mortgages as a possible aid to the waves of maturing interest-only loans with no repayment strategy. However, the FCA also wants RIO mortgages to be sold more widely, for example as an additional option […]