View more on these topics

FCA: The good and bad of RDR implementation


The Financial Conduct Authority has today published its early findings on how advisers are disclosing their advice services and charges, marking the first stage of its thematic review into RDR implementation.

Between February and April, the FCA sent 50 firms a questionnaire about how they explain to clients the advice services available and the associated charges.

The review found many firms’ propositions were in line with the new rules, but flagged concerns around a failure to disclose all advice charges in cash terms and the way firms were explaining their independent or restricted status.

Here we set out the FCA’s “early report card for the industry” which gives good and poor practice examples of how firms are approaching the RDR:

Adviser charging:

  • Good practice: One firm with a flat percentage charging structure gave a range of cash examples of the cost of advice based on investing £20,000, £50,000 or £100,000.
  • Bad practice: A firm described its adviser charge as a minimum of £1,500 to a maximum of £5,000 with no additional detail.

Independent status:

  • Poor practice: One firm describing itself as independent offered different service levels, ranging from a standard panel of managed funds and a bespoke portfolio for additional cost. In practice 99 per cent of clients were advised to invest in the managed funds. The FCA says the firm did not have the resources to provide an independent service for all clients.
  • Poor practice: Another firm explained its advice is restricted but did not sufficiently disclose the nature of the restriction. The firm could not make a general disclosure about its restriction as advisers were restricted in different ways, some by provider and some by product type.

Ongoing service:

  • Good practice: A firm provided three service options to clients, including one transactional service and two different levels of ongoing services. A table was used to show the differences between the two ongoing service levels, and the firm explained the cost of advice on necessary portfolio changes would be covered by the ongoing adviser charging.
  • Poor practice: Some firms explained a client’s right to stop ongoing services and charges by referring to “terminating the agreement”. The FCA says this phrase does not make it clear enough to clients they can stop ongoing advice charges or how they do this.

The FCA will review more adviser firms from October to test whether they have responded to its feedback.



FCA drops legal case against healthcare IT firm directors

Four former directors of healthcare IT firm iSOFT have been cleared of misleading investors after the FCA confirmed it would not be pursuing a second retrial against them. In January 2010, the regulator launched criminal proceedings against Patrick Cryne, Stephen Graham, Timothy Whiston and John Whelan for alleged conspiracy to make misleading statements between October 2003 and […]


Lloyds first lender to join Help to Buy MIG as concerns grow over supply

Lloyds Banking Group has become the first major lender to commit to joining the second instalment of the Help to Buy scheme. Chancellor George Osborne produced a 50 page draft proposal of the scheme highlighting it could not be used for second homes or buy to let. He also highlighted that lenders would have to […]

ASA bans ad over public sector unlocking claims

An advert claiming public servants could release money from their pension at any age has been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority. However, website was still making very similar claims to those banned by the ASA as Money Marketing went to press.  The website stated: “Do you work in public services, NHS, councils, armed forces, […]


Tony Byrne: Buffett shows why you should stick to your knitting

I have just finished reading Roger Lowenstein’s Warren Buffett biography. The story takes you up to 1995, by which time Buffett, the Sage of Omaha, was the richest man in the world. How did he do it? Buffet is an independent thinker who does not follow the crowd. He is a contrarian. When the markets are […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Ar$e Elbow!, Ar$e Elbow!, Ar$e Elbow!

    Does anyone at the FCA know the difference?

    Thought not!

  2. So consumers dont understand terminating agreement. What a load of rubbish. When the train terminates it stops we all know that except the FCA. What a pity the FCA is not terminated then advice would be available to all. not just VHNW. How long will it be before our client agreements have to be written in every language of the world so that every one regardless understands. The only thing I can see from this questionnaire is that it gives the FCA something to do and so justify the salaries paid!!!!!!

  3. The Bumbling Fool 26th July 2013 at 8:08 am

    50 firms, that many, eh?

    Looks like the RDR consultation lessons haven’t been learned.

    Oh, I surveyed two of my clients about commission and 100% said they liked it. My 297 page report on this with graphs, cashflow analysis, cost benefit conclusions and appendices will follow shortly.

Leave a comment