View more on these topics

Where was the Budget help for long-term saving?

Natalie Holt, journalist with Money Marketing Photo by Michael Walter/Troika

Chancellor Philip Hammond has delivered his first Budget, and by all accounts it was pretty underwhelming. For those of us used to the fireworks and rabbits out of hats delivered by his precedessor, this new style of Budget delivery takes some getting used to.

There was precious little on the much trailed package of reforms to long-term care funding, save for a reference to a social care green paper later this year. Hammond even made a point of saying there were never any plans to “exhume the much hated death tax”.

There was also practically no reference to pensions policy, or changes to the personal allowance or higher rate tax threshold, the usual mainstays of a Budget speech. Even Brexit was glossed over in a no more than cursory fashion.

In the run-up to recent Budgets, advisers and providers are usually found to be clamouring for a reprieve from the constant pace of pension policy tinkering. This time they have got what they wanted.

But it may be a case of being careful what you wish for. It seems some were actually hoping for some U-turns this time around, particularly on the much criticised reduction to the money purchase annual allowance.

References to the Lifetime Isa were also noticeable by their omission. In an upcoming cover story, Money Marketing sets out that with the launch imminent, not only are providers turning their backs on the product (for now at least), but consumers are too. The lack of providers is said to have got the Treasury so worked up it is calling firms on a weekly basis to check if they will offer the product.

The advice allowance, which will be introduced at the same time and allows savers to access their pension pot to pay for advice, has also been met with the cold shoulder.

These twin initiatives, engineered under George Osborne’s watch, are either met with disinterest from advisers or providers, or outright apathy from savers.

It is no wonder Hammond saw fit to deliver a pension policy-lite Budget, given that the projects already in train run the risk of failing before they have begun.

But the Chancellor’s own policies do little to instill confidence that the Government is trying to incentivise long-term saving and investment. The substantial cuts to both the dividend allowance and the money purchase annual allowance are cases in point.

Policymakers need to start engaging better with those at the coalface. If this happened, we could get to a more informed starting point for pensions and investments than the mish-mash we have at the moment.

Natalie Holt is editor of Money Marketing – follow her on Twitter here

Recommended

UK-Currency-Money-Pound-GBP-620x430.jpg
7

Govt to slash dividend allowance

Chancellor Philip Hammond has announced he will reduce the dividend allowance from £5,000 to £2,000. In his Budget speech today Hammond said the dividend allowance, introduced by his predecessor George Osborne, represented an “extremely generous tax break.” The Chancellor said the move would come into effect in April 2018. Writing for Money Marketing after the […]

Tax-Taxation-Blocks-700.jpg
3

Govt pushes ahead with cut to money purchase annual allowance

The Government has confirmed it will press ahead with the controversial reduction in the money purchase annual allowance from £10,000 to £4,000. A consultation on the move was launched following the Autumn Statement last year. The £4,000 MPAA will come into effect next month, and will apply to all individuals who have accessed their pension […]

4

Self-employed NICs to rise to 11%

Self-employed workers will face increases in their National Insurance contributions to reflect the increased state entitlements received by self-employed workers, Chancellor Philip Hammond has confirmed in today’s Budget. Class 4 National Insurance contributions will be increased by 1 per cent to 10 per cent from 2018, and to 11 per cent in 2019, raising £1.5bn […]

Japan 2017 Outlook: Abenomics 2.0

By Chris Taylor, head of Japanese Equities, Neptune Abe, having reinforced his political position domestically, will most likely hold off any further major policy enactments until after president Trump has settled into the White House and enacted some of his own. Then a relaunch of the Three Arrows programme is likely, or Abenomics 2.0, including […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. It simply confirms what we already know, politics is about making an impact the short term, nobody will get credit for improving the lives of savers 40 years down the line, so the can gets kicked down the road.

  2. Aside from disappointment that all the negative consultation feedback on the MPAA cut was ignored, the biggie for the pensions industry was surely the 25% tax on certain transfers to QROPS established outside the EEA. This should be a welcome and effective constraint on scams operating in this sector, and a better solution to the problem than the proposal implicit in the pension scams consultation to withdraw the statutory right to transfer to (any) QROPS.

Leave a comment