View more on these topics

Alistair Cunningham: Dividend allowance cut is a kind of stealth tax


The latent pedant in me has big issues with the term “tax-free” when applied to dividends.

Most dividends received by UK investors from UK companies have suffered a 20 per cent corporation tax liability. Corporation tax will soon fall to 19 per cent, and at a time so distant as to effectively be make-believe (after the general election) it will fall further to 17 per cent. The fact remains a dividend should be considered, by many, to be “tax-paid”.

This is why the introduction of the 7.5 per cent dividend charge from April 2016 was unfair, and the latest move to reduce the dividend allowance from £5,000 to £2,000 is even more unreasonable.

In terms of the relative tax paid, I have no doubt this will hit investors harder than the intended target of the “avoidance” measure: owner-managed businesses, particularly personal service companies.

Any company that is trading (and indeed this could apply to investment companies) will likely have earnings of tens of thousands. The stereotypical contractor could, for example, bill £100,000 in fees each year, add their spouse as a 50 per cent shareholder, possibly children and, as a worst-case scenario, see each of these shareholders pay an additional £225 when the dividend allowance falls to £2,000.

Given the avoidance of 40 per cent income tax by the primary worker and various reductions of 13.8 per cent for employer and 12 per cent for employee National Insurance, this is small fry.

But the retired individual with a share portfolio of £200,000 that is lucky enough to enjoy a dividend yield of 3 per cent will see their net dividend fall from £5,925 to £5,700 – this is an increase in their taxation by 500 per cent.

In the Budget the Chancellor also took the opportunity to increase Class 4 National Insurance contributions. The first issue with this decision is that increasing what is essentially a tax on the self-employed will simply encourage more individuals into corporate structures. Remember, any increase in national insurance of more than £225 is not offset by the changes detailed above to dividend taxation.

The second issue is one of fairness. With the abolition of Class 2 National Insurance anyone earning under £23,000 is still better off under the new self-employed rules compared with the current regime.

Profits of £23,000 equate to around £1,500 of National Insurance for a self-employed individual under both pre-2018 and post-2018 rules. In comparison, an employee on the same salary will contribute in excess of £3,800 to the Treasury. Above this level the difference is even more stark, with an employee on £32,000 (the example Philip Hammond used) paying over £6,000 in National Insurance between them and their employer, with the self-employed figure being less than half this, even when the final 11 per cent rate comes in from 2018.

As advisers we will still see our owner-managed business clients extracting profits in the broad tax-efficient priority order of: expenses, then pensions, then dividends, benefits where relevant, and only the lowest feasible level of salary or bonus. Naturally this is only a rule of thumb, and does not take into account a sale or other liquidation event, but the new rules do little to change this.

Because of this, I am left with two conclusions. The first is the change to dividends is an effective stealth tax on those with non-cash, non-Isa investment portfolios. It is perverse that, assuming no other taxable income, an individual can have in excess of £1m in cash without tax to pay, but probably only a few hundred thousand pounds in investments (and how much will it cost for all the extra self-assessment and unintentional evasion?).

The second is that now benefits for the self-employed are in broad harmony with employees, why will they continue to enjoy half the National Insurance, which is essentially just a tax on earned income?

Alistair Cunningham is director of Wingate Financial Planning

He will be joining us at Money Marketing Interactive as a speaker on May 18th. 

Click here for Money Marketing’s Budget coverage in full



Govt to slash dividend allowance

Chancellor Philip Hammond has announced he will reduce the dividend allowance from £5,000 to £2,000. In his Budget speech today Hammond said the dividend allowance, introduced by his predecessor George Osborne, represented an “extremely generous tax break.” The Chancellor said the move would come into effect in April 2018. Writing for Money Marketing after the […]

'Feeling the Squeeze'

Royal London carried out a UK wide survey with 2,500 consumers age 35-44 over the summer. The survey found that over a third, 34 per cent, said their finances felt Squeezed and so were struggling to meet day-to-day expenses, despite 87 per cent being aware that they need to save more. However, the survey did […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm