Tony Wickenden: How dividend tax changes will hit owner managers

Tony Wickenden 700x450

Over the past few weeks I have been looking at the dividend, salary and pension choices for SME owners in the light of the significant changes to the taxation of dividends taking effect this tax year.

The financial services sector, understandably, has focused on the impact for investors – not unexpectedly as the impact can be significant. However, the impact for owner managers is also substantial. This is especially so given that while many investors will benefit from the change to dividend taxation, the majority of SME owners will be detrimentally affected by this change.

Here are a few more important examples following those I shared with you last week.

Tonytable1
Tonytable2

Example one shows a one-person company wanting to keep income under the £100,000 personal allowance phasing level, with no employment allowance available.

It shows that the dividend route absorbs more gross profit (£10,304.46), which boosts the resulting net income by £13,982.80.

If at least £2,940 of employment allowance were available then, again as in table 2.1 printed in last week’s article, there would be a cut of £735 in the gross profit cost for the salary + dividend option and a corresponding reduction in net benefit of £352.80 due to the employee’s national insurance contributions.

Example two shows bonus, dividend and pension options for a higher rate taxpayer with £40,000 marginal gross profits to draw and no employment allowance available.

It shows that if there is no dividend allowance available, then the net benefit from the dividend route falls to £21,600 – only £1,213.36 more than the bonus route. The pension benefit is calculated as an uncrystallised funds pension lump sum with a marginal tax rate of 40 per cent. If the rate can be kept down to basic in retirement, the benefit rises to £34,000.

Tonytable3

Example three shows bonus, dividend and pension options for a basic rate taxpayer with £10,000 marginal gross profits to draw and no employment allowance available.

It shows that if there is no dividend allowance available, then the net benefit from the dividend route falls to £7,400 – still £1,424.60 more than the bonus route.

Next week I will look at how the pension commencement lump sum could be used in remuneration planning and what to watch out for.

Tony Wickenden is joint managing director of Technical Connection. You can find him Tweeting @tecconn

Recommended

Tony Wickenden: What now for tax policy post-Brexit?

As a result of the Brexit vote, we have seen political turmoil and share price volatility as well as a significant drop for sterling. A post-Brexit “emergency Budget’ appears to have been ruled out by new Chancellor Philip Hammond. Volatility in share prices is something we have quickly got used to the idea of living […]

Why prevention is better than cure

Quoting the famous adage, prevention is better than cure; there are many proactive benefits that can improve wellness in the workplace, decrease stress, increase staff morale and reduce absenteeism, as well as attracting and retaining employees of a higher standard. With a recent study showing that employees in Britain are working below peak productivity, preventative benefits can ensure you address potential health issues or causes of stress at their source and ensure productivity in the workplace remains at an optimum level. With this in mind, how are you using preventative benefits to help keep your workforce happy and healthy?

Scheme pays explained

By Fiona Hanrahan, senior product insight and technical support analyst We’ve received lots of queries on scheme pays and when it can be used. This article explains how it works and the conditions which apply. What is ‘scheme pays’? If an individual exceeds the annual allowance (AA) and an AA tax charge is due, they […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. The playing field has been levelled to some degree, and there is an opportunity to provide good advice, the use of EIS and VCT schemes is more relevant given that dividend tax can now be offset, whereas before the 10% was lost.

    However, let us not shed too many tears, in my experience many SME owners only declare a fraction of their taxable income, much of their personal lifestyle is disguised as business expenses and I am sure that HMRC know this, perhaps allowing some decency levels.

Leave a comment