View more on these topics

Taskforce reveals 300 charges in bid to cut ‘hidden’ fund costs

Money-Cash-Coins-GBP-Pounds-UK-700x450.jpg

An industry taskforce has identified more than 300 different costs associated with investments and pensions, and up to £120bn in hidden fees taken by asset managers a year.

Transparency Task Force has created a template listing the costs, which will be presented to the FCA and other organisations.

The template found more than 300 lines of costs and charges on investments and pension schemes, including administration, investment and risk management fees, client communication, legal, governance, regulation, compliance and intermediary fees.

The taskforce has identified six main stages of charges in the template: set-up, contribution, ongoing – steady state, ongoing – changes, withdrawal and wind-up. All the stages except set-up and the ongoing – steady state have transaction costs within them.

The research has been carried out for six months by a 39-member “costs and charges team” at the TTF.

Estimates from FiNexus co-managing director Chris Sier show asset managers in the UK earn between £40bn and £120bn in extra costs retail and pensions investors “pay without knowing”.

In June, the Association of Member Nominated Trustees voted to develop a template and the Investment Association has also moved in this direction.

It is working on a comprehensive disclosure code for asset managers to disclose investment costs.

Recommended

Paper mountain 010514.jpg
6

FOS orders Openwork to pay compensation over unsuitable charges

Openwork must compensate a client who complained about receiving unsuitable investment advice and claimed they were misled about charges. An Openwork adviser recommended the complainant, Mr M, transfer his existing bond and Isa to another provider with the client understanding charges for the new arrangement would be “broadly the same”. However, when he received the […]

FCA interior logo 620x430
1

FCA charge five over £2.75m Madeira property fraud

Five people have been charged following an FCA investigation into boiler room companies that lost investors £2.75m. Michael Nascimento, Hugh Edwards, Stuart Rea, Ryan Parker, and Jeannine Lewis appeared before Southwark Crown Court charged with conspiracy to defraud. Two of the five are also charged with perverting the course of justice and one with money […]

Lesley Titcombe

Pension Regulator extends £142m Capita deal

The Pensions Regulator has extended an enforcement and communications outsourcing deal with Capita for a further three years. The contract will cost TPR an additional £37m. In 2011, the regulator agreed a £105m seven-year arrangement that saw Capita handle employer communications including enforcement. Under the terms of the extension Capita will deliver “high-volume” correspondence with […]

A bull case for US equities?

Neptune video: a bull case for US equities?

Watch Felix Wintle, head of US equities at Neptune, discuss why he believes US equities are in a structural bull market and the key factors that can drive the S&P 500 higher.

In the video, Wintle addresses the following:

• The US market and why — despite equities rising from 2009 — he believes the structural bull market only started in 2013
• Key economic and corporate factors that can drive the S&P 500 higher
• Investment themes and sectors offering exposure to the domestic recovery

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Another piece of meaningless research unless it is put into context with the wider world.

    How about the same team doing an analysis of how many cost are involved when I buy a tin of baked beans at the supermarket. For a like for like exercise they would have to include all the cost of materials such beans, tomatoe sauce, metal, transport etc etc. I think a mere 300 charges would pale into insignificance.

    I wonder how many individual costs were involved in producing their report. I don’t have time to do it, I’m too busy advising clients so they have something more than the state to live off when they stop working.

    Why is only in financial services that people get paid to look at the minutiae of costs and then get away with presenting ‘horror’ results out of context.

Leave a comment