Are pension freedoms failing? Judging by the £900m that has gone to Treasury coffers as a result of the reforms, and the fact this is 28 per cent up on the forecasted tax take, the Government would no doubt say pension freedoms are working very nicely, thank you.
Of course this is not the only measure on which to judge success (though it is probably the only benchmark the Government is truly interested in).
For advisers the dial has not moved that much on the issue of insistent clients, as we saw this week in the case of Portal Financial, which has been ordered to pay redress after it transferred the pension pot of a client who could not read or write.
On pensions guidance, the restructure trailed as part of the Budget would suggest this has not worked either. No one has a bad word to say about The Pensions Advisory Service and they seem to be doing a stirling job.
But as we all know, the Money Advice Service has been all but consigned to the dustbin and at certain points over the last year Citizens Advice has appeared to lurch from crisis to crisis.
Pension freedoms mean more people need advice, and we need to get to a place where as many would-be clients as possible are getting in front of advisers.
But the great white hope to boost advice – the Financial Advice Market Review – has fallen flat and, what is more, is set to be mired in consultation for years to come. As evidenced by the FCA’s £519m budget, advice is not about to get any cheaper.
The other worry is we do not know in any meaningful sense what people are doing with their newly released pension cash. Is it flowing into buy-to-let? Being parked in cash? Ending up in dodgy unregulated investment scams? The truth is we just do not know.
Proponents of pension freedoms say the brave new world has re-energised engagement in pensions like nothing else. That may well be the case.
But the dangers, risks and challenges associated with the reforms are at once clearly definable and yet unquantifiable.
Perhaps the Government should be spending less time eyeing up the tax take and more time examining whether the freedoms are working for consumers, and helping the industry gain a deeper understanding of whether the reforms have changed the market for better or for worse.
Natalie Holt is editor of Money Marketing – follow her on Twitter here