View more on these topics

Carl Lamb: Unite to show advice firms aren’t the enemy

Carl Lamb

The world of financial advice is as competitive a marketplace as any other industry, which is a good thing. However, it is also a world under threat due to the increasing cost of regulation.

What is more, we have the FCA pulling us one way to tighten procedures and the Government pulling us another to enable greater choice for clients. Times are tough and if we sit back and let it all happen, they will get tougher.

Now is the time for those advisers who care about the future of the industry to talk to each other and take joint action to lobby the Government and the FCA. The Financial Advice Market Review is an ideal opportunity for us to have our say. We should not let this opportunity pass us by.

The key is collaboration. There is no excuse for anyone running an advice firm not to be concerned about the issues facing the sector. Only by talking to each other and then reacting with a single voice can we help influence Government and FCA strategy in the future.

We need a sea change at FCA level too. We sometimes feel it sees the advice sector as a barrier to the client’s best interests that must be scaled to get good outcomes. It is high time it recognised advice firms are not the enemy. We want quality, transparency and fairness for every client, every time.

Yes, we want to make profits – how can we survive as businesses unless we are financially viable? – but we also want to build sound long-term relationships with clients who have become our friends.

Here in East Anglia we have created a group of what we believe to be among the best firms in the region. We call it East Anglian Independent Voice and it is our aim to fight both for higher standards in the industry and for an environment where we can continue to provide affordable, unbiased advice.

Our group is made up of the people who run these firms: the directors or partners who have an eye on the long-term strategies and who hold the responsibility of some 200 employees. Our discussions encompass everything from the service performance of certain providers to the availability and cost of professional indemnity insurance. However, a theme to which we return time after time is how the industry is to survive under the pressures being piled upon it.

There have been attempts in the past to create national lobby groups, some of which have fallen by the wayside. I am a member of Apfa, which may well be the channel through which we can make our voices heard in the future. Whatever channel we choose to adopt, it must have the support of a broad representation of the advice sector.

My challenge to all those who run advice firms is this: do not bury your heads in the sand. Engage in the debate about the future of our industry. Join lobby groups or form your own. Respond to the FCA’s call for input. It is our world, so it is up to us to make it a better place.

Carl Lamb is managing director of Almary Green



MM leader: Can advisers breach the lobbying chasm?

When you examine what now deposed Investment Association boss Daniel Godfrey was asking of members, it does not seem like that much of a stretch. The trade body’s apparently controversial statement of principles was a voluntary code of conduct where signatories pledged to, among other things, put clients’ interests first, take care of clients’ money […]


Death of the trade body? Provider lobby groups reach crisis point

The Big Three trade bodies for savings and investment have reached a “turning point” and must act quickly to guarantee their survival, experts warn. Investment Association chief executive Daniel Godfrey’s sudden departure, Aegon quitting the Association of British Insurers and the impact of the pension freedoms on the National Association of Pension Funds has cast uncertainty over the […]


Carl Lamb: FSCS costs push advisers to breaking point

I have always been a supporter of tighter regulation and the cleaning up of our industry. Greater transparency and protection for the client is hugely important and the loss of some of our community’s less professional players has certainly been for the good. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that the way we provide protection […]

Artemis Monthly Distribution Fund: positioning and outlook

Managers James Foster and Jacob de Tusch-Lec outline the fund’s investment approach and discuss current investment themes and outlook for the bond and equity markets. As James and Jacob confirm, the Artemis Monthly Distribution Fund’s aim is to generate an income from both equities and bonds. They explain their investment approach in each asset class, the sectors where they are […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I agree Carl, but if we feedback our opinions via our lobby groups (APFA or Libertatem for instance) the FCA and treasury appear to listen to them as lone voices rather than based on the number of members providing input. This is why for about 10 years I used to respond to F-pack discussion papers and other Govt/quango papers. I have stopped doing so as they only listen to what they hear in London. It doesn’t matter what we say, they will do what they do and then change it back again…. and again…. and again…..and again. Keeps them all in work though (in theory), in practice there are getting less and less advisers in proportion to quangocrats.

  2. I applaud your message Carl. At the PFS London Symposium Keith Richards stressed the same message. I believe the PFS is the right route by which to voice our concerns as a profession and I would encourage all members to do so and those who aren’t members to look more closely at what the PFS is endeavouring to achieve – and perhaps join.

Leave a comment