View more on these topics

Film scheme investors granted appeal in HMRC tax avoidance ruling

2094965_HMRC-HM-Revenue-Customs-700x450

More than 150 investors in film partnership schemes have been granted permission to appeal a High Court ruling which found in favour of HM Revenue & Customs.

In July, the court rejected the investors’ attempt to challenge the legality of demands by HMRC to pay disputed tax upfront.

The claimants claimed tax relief after investing in Ingenious Media schemes. Almost 10 years later they were served with payment notices by HMRC.

HMRC began issuing accelerated payment notices in July 2014 after being given new powers by the Government.

The notices allow HMRC to demand payment of disputed tax associated with a tax avoidance scheme upfront.

Previously, an individual could appeal the decision through a tribunal and would not have to pay until HMRC won through the courts.

Individuals can still appeal through a tribunal but must pay the tax upfront and will only be refunded, with interest, if they win.

Lead investors Nigel Rowe and Alec Worrall received payment notices for £270,100 and £96,400, respectively.

The investors claimed the notices were unlawful and HMRC was out of time to recover any tax. However, the judge ruled the notices were lawfully issued.

The Court of Appeal has now given the investors permission to appeal the decision.

Lord Justice Floyd said: “The issues are plainly sufficiently important to be considered by the full court, and the grounds have a real prospect of success.”

A spokesman for HMRC says it does not comment on cases in the process of litigation.

Recommended

Steve Webb hits back over new state pension and triple lock

Former pensions minister Steve Webb has defended communication of the new state pension, the triple lock and played down the concerns of women who will miss out under the new regime. Speaking to the Work and Pensions committee today, Webb hit back at claims the new system has been missold. Earlier this month, pensions minister […]

Woodford-Neil.WoodfordIM.2014.jpg
2

Woodford shuns ‘impenetrable’ banking sector

The banking sector is facing “very challenging headwinds” and is “pretty impenetrable”, says Neil Woodford, which is why he is not invested in the sector. Woodford, speaking at the AJ Bell Investival conference in London last week, says he has been out of the banking sector for “a long time”, largely because he finds the […]

barclays-building-2012-700x450.jpg
5

‘Elephant’ deals and cutting corners: Why FCA fined Barclays £72m

Staff at Barclays lowered due diligence standards for a group of ultra high-net-worth individuals in a bid to avoid “irritating” the clients, the FCA’s final notice reveals. This morning the regulator revealed it had fined the bank £72m for applying lower standards of scrutiny to a £1.88bn deal involving several “politically exposed persons”. According to […]

Pension-pot-700.jpg
5

Govt to tackle GARs advice confusion

The Government could scrap the requirement to put a value on guaranteed annuity rates when deciding whether savers need to take regulated advice. A Department for Work and Pensions consultation, published today, sets out a proposal that would see the advice threshold based solely on the size of pots, not the value of guarantees. In […]

Abe and Modi

India: Modi, reform and the oil price fall

Nearly 12 months since sweeping to power, prime minister Narendra Modi has overseen a significant turnaround in India, which is now on track to become one of the most pro-growth, pro-investment economies in Asia. While the market has rallied 48 per cent over the last year in response to Modi’s reform agenda, what is the potential for further progress?

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Seems to me this could go to the European Court of Human Rights.

  2. I don’t understand why there’s no system whereby schemes of this type can be submitted to HMRC for approval (or possibly veto) before they’re marketed. Surely that would save all parties an awful lot of money?

Leave a comment