The Brexit effect on ex-pat state pensions

Brexit 2

Membership of the European Union has been beneficial to British expats retiring to other member states, as they have the same state pension rights as those who reside in the UK. But Brexit inevitably means this situation cannot continue in its present form and the 1.2 million Brits estimated to be living in other EU countries have been left with an unclear picture as to how the leave vote will impact their state pension income.

Although the UK state pension can be paid out anywhere in the world, qualifying for annual increases under the triple-lock guarantee depends on where people emigrate. The triple lock, introduced by the coalition government in 2010, ensures that state pensions go up
in line with the higher of inflation, average earnings or 2.5 per cent. People who retire to countries within the European Economic Area, which includes EU countries, qualify for annual pension increases under the triple-lock guarantee as if they were living in the UK. So do those who retire to Switzerland and Gibraltar.

Other parts of the world, such as the US and Barbados, have social security agreements with the UK that enable expats to qualify for the annual increases to their state pensions. However, people who are retiring to countries that have no social security agreements with the UK – or Canada and New Zealand that have different ones – do not quality for state pension increases, so their pensions are frozen at their initial rate.

Calls for parity so everyone benefits from annual increases as a matter of fairness have been made in recent years but so far nothing has changed. Brexit takes the issue of what is fair and practical to another level, as it cannot be assumed the status quo will simply be replicated by a deal, however desirable this is. The concern for British expats is that they may be joining the ranks of those with frozen state pensions once the UK finally leaves the EU.

Expats need certainty

According to AJ Bell senior analyst Tom Selby, the Government needs to provide people living in the EU with certainty about their future as soon as possible. He points out that for British expats living in the EU to continue receiving their annual state pension increases – known as uprating – the UK will either need to agree a reciprocal arrangement with the EU as a whole or strike deals with individual member states.

He says: “It’s worth noting that, outside the EU, no reciprocal arrangement has been struck since 1981, primarily due to the costs involved in uprating the pensions of people who retire abroad. Ultimately, the Government must decide how best to allocate resources and it may prefer to  focus on those who remain in the UK rather than those who retire abroad.”

Selby raises the possibility that people planning to retire to EU countries in the future might reconsider if they lose their uprating. “While an increase of 2.5 per cent a year might not sound like a lot, a 65-year-old receiving the flat-rate state pension of £155 a week who lived for 20 years would miss £50,000 of income in retirement if their pension was frozen,” he says.

For Graham Keysell, a director at The Spectrum IFA Group’s office in France, the UK Government will inevitably be tempted to save money by ending the increases to pensioners living in the EU.

“For British expats  living in the EU to continue receiving their annual state pension increases, the UK will need to agree a reciprocal arrangement with the EU or strike deals with individual states”

He says: “It is already estimated the Treasury saves around half-a-billion pounds a year from pensioners excluded from the increases. This could easily double if pensioners in the EU were to be treated similarly.”

Keysell thinks that because the number of overseas voters still on the UK electoral register is negligible, the Government might decide that upsetting these people would have a very modest negative effect. Indeed, as Royal London director of policy Steve Webb points out, expats’ voting power is “almost nil” because so few are registered to vote.

He says: “The Government doing something about this won’t be down to the political power of the expat voter, it will be driven by the Treasury. However, my hunch is that the Government will want to negotiate state pension deals. It builds uprating into its base line, so it doesn’t have to find new money for this.”

Saving money

Both Webb and Keysell think the Government will be under pressure to preserve the existing system as it would not want expats coming back to the UK and putting a strain on services such as healthcare.

Keysell says: “If access to free healthcare in the host country was also abolished, the UK Government could easily find that significant numbers of pensioners return to the UK, which is a situation it would want to avoid.”

Webb agrees, pointing out that it is more plausible for people to return from European countries such as Spain than somewhere further afield, such as Australia. “The UK Government will not want older expats of, say, 75-plus coming home. With that in mind, I suppose a general deal will be done,” he says.

Before a deal is done

Tisa policy strategy director Adrian Boulding is also cautiously optimistic about the bargaining process that lies ahead. He says: “British expat pensioners spend good money in the warmer European countries such as Spain, and this is something the EU will want to continue. So the generosity of reciprocal state pension deals for them are yet another negotiating card that will come into play. That said, while the eventual outcome will probably be no change, I’d prepare for a period of uncertainty, as the UK Brexit team can’t give things away piecemeal before the whole deal is done.”

The fall in sterling is presenting another big issue for expat pensioners who are now getting fewer euros for their pounds. Following the referendum result, the exchange rate between sterling and the euro fell from near €1.40 to less than €1.18.

“British expat pensioners spend good money in warmer countries such as Spain and this is something the EU will want to continue”

Expat advice firm AES chief executive Sam Instone says: “Brexit has caused sterling to drop to a 31-year low on currency markets. For the expat with pension assets or income denominated in pounds this is a big hit to value in their local currency.”

However, law firm King & Wood Mallesons lead pensions consultant Wyn Derbyshire highlights the fact the Government is yet to trigger Article 50 and says anything can happen in a political environment that has had more than its fair share of drama.

He says: “If all EU agreements fall by the wayside the default is that state pensions will be  frozen unless Britain enters into individual agreements. However, I hope there is a common sense approach and that we find a way of working together – some way of compromise rather than taking hardline decisions.”



Steve Bee: The UK’s state pension crunch will hit in the 2020s

According to Gordon Dryden Gilling-Smith’s 1967 Guide to Pensions and Superannuation, the first recorded pensioner was someone called Martin Horsham. Horsham retired on 10 March 1684 on a pension of £40 a year. That may not sound much today but, at that time, average yearly earnings in skilled trades were between £30 and £36 a […]

John Lawson: Raise state pension age or expect spending cuts

In March, the former director general of the Confederation of British Industry John Cridland was appointed to review the state pension age. His report must be published by May next year. The review does not cover the rise in state pension age to 66, which completes in October 2020, or the rise to age 67, […]


Waspi urges DWP mass-mailing to fuel Ombudsman complaints

The Women Against State Pension Inequality group is organising a mass-mailing to the Department for Work and Pensions in the hope it will lead to formal complaints to the Parliamentary Ombudsman. The group, which wants transitional measures for women who have seen their state pension age increase, provide an email template and detail how to […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Dear Ms Smith.
    Thank you for highlighting the predicament some expats find themselves in by having retired in the wrong country. Thank you also for giving us the opportunity to comment on your article.
    Your paragraph, “Other parts of the world………..” is similar to that of other journalists who have been understanderbly mislead by government spin.
    To paint a clearer picture, may I quote from UK Gov sources confirmation that “Reciprocal Agreements” are certainly & definitly NOT needed for uprating in any country to take place.
    In 2007 James Purnell DWP Minister of State for Pension Reform said, “Of course, it is not legally necessary to ha a reciprocal arrangement before making such (uprating) payments. Any government could do that unilaterally.”
    A 1997 Social Security Select Committee report stated, “it would clearly be impractical to negotiate bialateral agreements with ,each of the other countries in the world where people draw British state retirement pensions, and in any case unnecessary, a simple change in British law could enable uprating to be paid in any or all of overseas countries, provided the political will was there to do so.”
    A Dept of Social Security Memo states, “Reciprocal social security agreements are not entered into solely with a view into paying annual uprating increases ,to UK pensioners living abroad. They are not necessary for that purpose, as uprating can be achieved through British domestic legislation.”
    Finally and most damningly, this reply numbered 595/2013 to a Freedom of Information request to the DWP. “Bi-lateral agreements are not necessary in order for for pensions paid outside Great Britain and the EU to be uprated,”
    I hope this clarifies what can be a very cloudy puddle of the government’s own making! Thank you once again for your article.

  2. Where do you get the figure of £50,000 lost over 20 years on the current state pension? The new pension amounts to roughly £8000 pa and even at compound rates of the first years loss of 2 1/2%, approximately £200, it is nothing like that figure. Is this more doom mongering from the financial sector.

  3. Given that pensioners are the biggest burden on the NHS, you would think it was in the UK’s interest to encourage its citizens to retire abroad!

  4. William Hamilton. 13th March 2017 at 10:28 pm

    I retired to a non EU country and therefore do not receive annual cost of living increases on my state pension. I have always felt that this is totally unfair as we have all paid into the system during our lives. If Brexit prevents U.K. ex pats from receiving the increases then that will be the case and equalises with my situation. However if and agreement is reached within the EU. for the increases to continue then I think that the U.K. must also grant the annual increases to those living outside the EU too as it would be totally and morally unjust for them not to do so.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm