View more on these topics

HMRC under fire over failure to monitor potential scams

2094965_HMRC-HM-Revenue-Customs-700x450

The Government has come under fire for its monitoring of potential pension scams.

Money Marketing submitted a Freedom of Information request to HM Revenue & Customs asking for the number and value of unauthorised payment notices made in relation to pension liberation.

Unauthorised payment charges are made when a saver withdraws their pension before the age of 55. Pots are subject to at least a 55 per cent charge.

The tax office confirmed it held the information but rejected the request on the grounds it would breach the cost limit of one person working for three-and-a-half days.

It said it would normally suggest ways to bring costs down but in this case it “cannot see any scope for doing this”.

HMRC said: “The only way we could retrieve and collate the information you have requested would be to carry out a manual search for all individual files.”

But providers and advisers say HMRC’s lack of transparency is hindering the fight against scammers. Aegon head of pensions Kate Smith says: “This is of public interest, we want to know how many people are being charged and how much is being levied. We need people to know that if they break the law they will be penalised.

“If we don’t go after them the number of scams will multiply. We need HMRC to back up what we say, we all need to work together. They really need to get more resource and nip this in the bud.”

Rowley Turton director Scott Gallacher says: “This is not an unreasonable request. If the number was high it would be a big red flag for the regulator and help providers and advisers deal with this. Equally, if it’s a low number, that tells us a lot.

“I am amazed that it cannot be completed in three-and-a-half days, it’s worrying they do not have the data on this. I can’t believe this isn’t monitored properly.”

In February the High Court overturned a Pensions Ombudsman decision that backed Royal London over a customer who argued they were unfairly blocked from transferring.

Lawyers warn the decision could give the green flag to hundreds of similar suspect scam cases.

Recommended

Justice-Fine-Ban-Court-Gavel-Judge-700x450.jpg

HMRC wins latest Supreme Court film scheme fight

HMRC has been handed a victory by the Supreme Court, which ruled against a group of film scheme investors seeking to appeal a February decision that their actions constituted tax avoidance. The tax office has been engaged in a long-running legal battle with the Eclipse 35 group since 2011, with courts repeatedly ruling in favour […]

MPs give HMRC six months to crack down on tax fraud

A damning report from Parliament’s public spending watchdog has given HM Revenue & Customs six months to set out its strategy for tackling tax fraud. The Public Accounts Committee raised serious concerns about the ability of the UK’s tax authorities to prosecute tax dodgers, as well as its effectiveness as a deterrent. In particular, the […]

HMRC takes film scheme battle to Supreme Court

HM Revenue & Customs is to launch a multi-million pound battle in the Supreme Court with a group of film scheme investors. A hearing will open on Wednesday over a £503m deal between an investment group and Walt Disney Pictures. Members of Eclipse 35 paid the sum to acquire the distribution rights on two Disney […]

2

HMRC nets record £4.3bn IHT haul

HMRC has taken in more than £4bn in revenues from inheritance tax for the first time, according to figures from the UK tax office. Statistics published for the 11 months to February 2016 show the Government has benefited from the tax to the tune of £4.3bn. Although revenues dropped substantially in 2008/9, plummeting by £1bn […]

Changes to early exit pension charges

In November last year, the FCA announced that from 31 March 2017, early exit pension charges will be capped at 1% for those customers who are eligible to access their retirement savings from age of 55. The rules also state that for new personal pension plans started after that date, or on new increments into […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Lets reverse this so the truth is emphasised rather than the insurers spin.

    In the Hughes case, the High Court confirmed the insurers were acting CONTRARY to the law, NOT Ms Hughes and even after the High Court decision, insurers including Scottish Widows are acting contrary to the decision i.e. are breaking the law this is even when hwy know there is no pension liberation going on.

Leave a comment