View more on these topics

What’s the IHT position on final salary transfers?

Andrew Tully White background 700

I have been running various adviser events around the country over the last few weeks and a regular question has arisen connected to the rising numbers of final salary transfers. What is the inheritance tax position, especially if the transfer is driven by the desire for better death benefits and the customer is in relatively poor health?

The number of final salary transfers being considered has increased rapidly since the pension freedoms. Better death benefits are a key driver in many cases.

In occasional circumstances, IHT can be factor when a transfer takes place. It can be argued this is an unfair rule: in most cases, the money is moving from one scheme where death benefits would be free of IHT to another. However, by transferring, the individual has the power to determine the payment of death benefits. HM Revenue & Customs believes this right has value because the member could direct payment to their own estate – however unlikely it is.

If the individual dies within two years of making a transfer, the executors are required to report this to HMRC. At that point, the customer’s health (and their knowledge of it) when they made the transfer becomes relevant.

If the person was in normal health, HMRC deems there to be no loss to the estate. However, if the person knew they were seriously ill when the transfer took place (expecting to live for less than two years) then an IHT charge can arise.

At this point, a valuation will determine the loss to the estate. The difficulty here is that HMRC has significant discretion and the calculations are not specified anywhere. However, it is important to note it is not simply the transfer value that is taken into account. Instead, HMRC will value the death benefits that could have been paid to the estate from the new contract, then deduct the value of the retirement benefits the member could have taken before death.

Historically, this has been tax-free cash plus the value of an annuity with a 10-year guarantee that could have been bought (taking into account tax, inflation and the non-assignability of an annuity). With pension freedoms, that may no longer be a suitable measure, so it is feasible HMRC may simply add the tax-free cash to the remaining fund minus any income tax due.

It is worth bearing in mind that transferring could still be the best outcome, even if there is an IHT charge. For example, if a final salary scheme provides poor death benefits it may be advantageous to transfer to another scheme that pays a return of fund, as the family would receive a higher value, even after the IHT charge.

There are many reasons why people consider transferring from a final salary scheme. If death benefits are a key driver due to the ill health of the member, being aware of the IHT position is crucial, although a transfer may still be the best outcome.

Andrew Tully is pensions technical director at Retirement Advantage


IHT and the pension transfer window

Generally speaking, trustees and scheme administrators have discretion over the distribution of death benefits from a pension scheme. This is important as it means the benefits can usually be paid free of any inheritance tax. However, the reform to the taxation of death benefits and the record £4.6bn IHT revenue HM Revenue & Customs took […]


Steve Webb: DB transfer shouldn’t be all-or-nothing

A hot topic in my recent discussions with advisers has been the growing number of people interested in transferring their defined benefit pension rights into a defined contribution scheme. With many schemes offering eye-watering transfer values, this is likely to be an area of increasing interest. However, many advisers, for understandable reasons, are reluctant to […]

Partied out and penniless

December has left me destitute. My piggy bank lies broken and empty, my lunchtime meal deal feels like an extravagant expense and I’m down to the Bountys in my box of Celebrations. But I won’t mourn my dearly departed pennies. Between buying gifts for loved ones (then deciding to keep them for myself) to treating […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. HMRC have been after this since the 80’s so all advisers should already be aware of this “omission to exercise a right” problem that now effectively relates to the DB transfers in that you are creating a IHT free fund.
    Having said that the above was tough for HMRC to prove so like LTC reports will be looked at and Advisers need to warn clients that until the 2 year period is over they are not “safe” from IHT

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm