View more on these topics

Tax relief reform could spark more ‘cash for pension’ bribes

Boulding-Adrian-2012-700x450.jpg

Government plans to reform tax relief could result in more employers following the NHS and tempting staff with deals that lead them to give up pension contributions in favour of high salaries.

Last week it was revealed the Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust in South-east London is giving newly-qualified band five nurses the choice of being paid money that would go into the NHS scheme.

The NHS Pension Board and Royal College of Nursing expressed alarm but the trust defended its arrangement, which has been in place since January.

The trust says it makes “no direct savings” in the deal and The Pensions Regulator “concluded the choice we are offering is lawful”.

But Tisa policy director Adrian Boulding warns potential changes to the tax relief system could encourage other employers to follow the NHS.

Chancellor George Osborne is due to announce radical reforms to tax relief in the Budget next month.

Boulding says: “One possibility is he will cut employers’ National Insurance relief, in which case expect to see a whole load more of this kind of behaviour.

“Today, if you’re an employer and you put £100 into a pension it only costs £100, but if NI relief is cut the employer has to pay an extra 13.8 per cent on it.”

Willis Towers Watson senior consultant David Robbins says the regulator has limited power to stop firms offering inducements. He says: “I’ve got a bit of sympathy with TPR here – they can only enforce the laws Parliament has passed.

“It’s not in anyone’s interest for TPR to take action in a case it would lose a legal challenge to. That sends out a message that people can do exercises like this. It would be counterproductive and a waste of tax and levy payers’ money.

“However, the regulator’s guidance is contradictory in places. In its guidance on inducements they give two examples that conflict. For that, TPR can rightly be criticised.”

A TPR spokesman says: “Our published guidance sets out our view of what constitutes inducement. The guidance specifies an employer is in breach where their sole or main purpose is to induce workers to leave the pension scheme.

“We investigate each case on a case-by-case basis. Some cases may be less clear-cut than others but in fact do not constitute inducement –for example, where employers offer a flexible benefits package and give staff a genuinely free and fair choice as to whether they choose to stay in a scheme or take alternative benefits. Where the employer has no vested interest in the individual’s decision, it would not constitute inducement.”

Expert view

Automatic enrolment is a significant cost to employers, and it would be understandable if some were tempted to quietly encourage their workers to opt out. That is why section 54 of the 2008 Pensions Act says firms may not take any action “for the sole or main purpose” of inducing a worker to give up membership of a relevant scheme.

By and large, that legislation seems to have worked and until now there have been few reports of inappropriate inducements. The worry about the actions of this NHS trust, which seem to have been allowed on a technicality, is that they could set a very dangerous precedent.

While policing larger unionised employers like NHS Trusts is relatively easy, policing thousands of small firms will not be. So it is vital  regulators put the situation beyond doubt and make sure no employer is tempted to incentivise an employee to opt out of their workplace pension scheme.

The whole idea of automatic enrolment is millions of people will benefit from saving in a pension and this should be the default position. Without having to take any action, auto enrolled workers start to build up pension rights and can look forward to a better retirement. But this idea would be fatally undermined if employers start offering cash today on condition that workers opt out of their pension.

Cash today is always likely to be more attractive than cash in retirement, but if this catches on, especially among younger workers, all the progress made under auto enrolment could be undermined.

Steve Webb is director of policy at Royal London

Recommended

UK-Currency-Money-Coin-Pounds-GBP-700x450.jpg
1

Pound hits 7-year low amid Brexit panic

The pound has hit a seven-year low against the dollar, as fears about the UK leaving the European Union sparked nervousness among investor. Yesterday the pound dropped by 2.4 per cent at its lowest to hit $1.4059, lower than the $1.4079 low on 21 January. The fall marked its weakest rate against the dollar since March 2009, when […]

John-Cowan-700.jpg
4

John Cowan: Industry must cut costs to offer mass market advice

The market for providing financial advice to well-off clients who can both afford to pay for that advice and understand the benefits of it has never been as buoyant. It’s a different story for those with more modest savings and income where, ironically, there is an argument that the need for good, sound professional advice […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. My goodness don’t these gurus catch on fast. Ever since the introduction of AE I have been warning of this. Indeed I helped and encouraged small firms to the best of my ability (and within the rules) to avoid this ridiculous impost. Even with tax relief AE did very little for the lower paid who were over 40 and would probably have resulted in them being worse off with the potential reduction in eventual benefits.

    I really do believe that we may all yet live to see AE and perhaps even DC pensions in general die a death unless current, proposed and rumoured rules are not reversed. In view of the fact that pension rules seem to change on every second Tuesday, I don’t think that is too fanciful.

  2. Whilst the NHS trust got round the technicality on inducement how do they get round the fact they are making the member make a decision as to whether to join the scheme or take higher pay? They are meant to be automatically in without any decision having to be made….how do they skirt this rule?

Leave a comment