View more on these topics

Lord Hutton: Pension providers must ‘shatter’ charges opacity

LHutton02

Former Work and Pensions secretary Lord John Hutton has called on pension providers to dramatically improve transparency around charges.

In an interview with Money Marketing, Hutton says it is time to get below a surface level analysis of fees charged on pension pots.

He says: “Where does the money go? Who is skimming off what? There’s a level of opacity that really does need to be shattered.”

Chancellor George Osborne revealed a new duty for the FCA to cap excessive transfer and exit fees in January, and since then providers including Aviva, Prudential and Standard Life have all revealed plans to limit charges.

However, Hutton says it is important to attack the lack of transparency in more depth.

He says: “At the moment, we are focused on a level of management fees and charges, and we have the incoming cap, but that’s a very blunt instrument.

“Underneath that there are all sorts of things we need to challenge and push back on.”

The Labour peer adds pension providers must do more to help savers understand what kind of income they can expect in retirement.

He says: “There’s an absolute absence of any kind of benchmarking or understanding that people get.

“DC [defined contribution] will be DC, and I understand that. But I want to see plans much more income-focused, so that people are saving towards a particular level of target retirement income.”

Hutton adds the industry could lead on reforms by introducing “waypoints” for savers throughout accumulation, which provide rough indicators of likely retirement income.

“Then if it’s not what you want it to be, you can make choices to save more or work longer. I really do think the industry has to step
up there.”

Hutton told Money Marketing last March of his regret at failing to introduce an independent pensions commission following the Turner report in 2006.

Earlier this month, the Labour-commissioned Blake Report again called for a new commission, with an additional remit for long-term care savings.

Hutton maintains it is an idea with merit, particularly when it comes to introducing independent analysis to pensions policy.

He says: “Getting people to save more and to start saving earlier is going to take every conceivable lever that we have at our disposal, and we’re going to have to pull quite hard on all of them.

“The Government on its own, with all its powers of persuasion, is unlikely to be able to do the job because people want some genuine independent analysis.

“There’s an absolute dearth of that at the moment.”

Hutton adds: “Governments hate doing things like this. It gives up power and it sets up someone to say things that might be difficult in the future.

“But this is the number one public policy challenge that as a country we face.”

At the same time, the Labour peer admits his own party is yet to prove it can effectively hold the Government to account on key financial services issues like pensions.

“We’ve got a long way to go. We’ve taken a wrong turn with the choice of our new leader.

“We are running the risk of looking completely irrelevant and out of touch with modern Britain by reverting to a script that seems to have more to do with the 1920s than it does with the 2020s.”

Recommended

George-Osborne-sips-from-coffee-cup-700.jpg
4

FOS pension freedom complaints on the rise

The number of customers approaching the Financial Ombudsman Service with complaints over pension freedoms is rising, Money Marketing can reveal. A Freedom of Information request submitted by Money Marketing shows between July 2015 and February 2016 there were 848 new enquiries to the FOS relating to the freedoms. These include complaints where customers claim they […]

Streatfield-Malcolm-Lighthouse-2013
1

Lighthouse rejects £17m AFH takeover bid

Lighthouse Group has rejected a £17.4m acquisition by advice consolidator AFH. A stock market announcement published today reveals AFH approached Lighthouse earlier this month with a takeover deal valuing Lighthouse shares at 13p. However yesterday the Lighthouse Board confirmed it has rejected the initial offer. AFH says it is considering whether it will make changes […]

Feeney-Paul-2013-700x450.jpg

Old Mutual confirms business carve-up

Old Mutual has confirmed plans to separate its four businesses, including Old Mutual Wealth, following a strategic review. In its results statement published this morning, Old Mutual confirmed earlier reports that it will be looking to split its business along four lines: Old Mutual Wealth, South African lender Nedbank, the South African Old Mutual Emerging […]

Life cover for life

When someone mentions whole of life plans, most people will think of a niche product that serves as an inheritance tax planning tool for high-net-worth clients. And it’s really not surprising they’ve been pigeonholed in that waybecause before the arrival of RDR in 2013, that’s more or less exactly what they were. For advisers thinking […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Douglas Baillie 24th March 2016 at 2:01 pm

    Would this apply to SJP?

  2. Absolutely right – we need a sound transparent system on a par with, say, MP`s expenses.

  3. Why this constant targeting of pensions? After all most of the costs are the underlying funds so why not deal with that first.

    Then again fund managers aren’t as newsworthy as pensions are they!

Leave a comment