View more on these topics

Neil Liversidge: Fatal flaws of past network models

Neil Liversidge

This third part of my look at the changing face of independence starts with my arrival in the research and technical support department of DBS in 1995. Ken Davy had set up DBS some years before. He was an inspirational leader who genuinely believed in independence. I arrived just as the firm was debating whether or not to continue with broker funds. I weighed in straight away on the “against” side, citing the experiences of my two previous employers. DBS agreed. It looked good.

DBS set out to allow members the maximum amount of freedom in what they did, they just had to do it compliantly. The staff in Huddersfield were enthusiastic and genuine people who really wanted to help the members run successful businesses. I worked umpteen hours of unpaid overtime but it was a joy to me.

A key duty was the compiling of fund panels. We did it honestly. Sure, providers threw a lot of money at DBS to buy a presence at regional meetings and enhanced commission deals were done, particularly on bonds. But nobody ever tried to compel me to panel a provider because they were paying. Nor was I ever prevented from panelling providers that were not. Panels, in any case, were not exclusive. Members could sell non-panelled funds and products provided they wrote their own justifications and recorded their own research.

Not everyone appreciated our independence, however. I got hauled up once to explain why I had issued a newsletter detailing the advantages of unit trusts over bonds. One large insurer – a significant “supporter” – had taken serious exception and demanded I issue another newsletter retracting the first. I refused. The article was factual and correct so why would I? A compromise was reached. The insurer got to issue a blurb pointing out the advantages of bonds as it saw them. I counted it as a victory for independence and objectivity.

The network independent model had a fatal weakness, though. Members equated independence with their ability to sell anything they chose, resisting the notion we could “ban” certain products. And they still expected the network to carry the can. This caused tensions. Naturally, compliance wanted a tighter approach but those charged with driving profits were focused on keeping the members happy and not losing them to competitors. The problem was a mismatch between the members’ power to sell what they wanted and their willingness (unwillingness, actually) to accept responsibility for doing so.

In 1998, after a few regulatory problems, DBS’s board seemed to lose confidence in its own ability to run the business. It also seemed to lose direction. There was much introspection as to what the firm’s network model should actually look like. That resulted in the hiring of management consultants.

The changes they put in place were disastrous but before that fact was realised the leader of the project had created a position for herself as member services director. In 2000 she fired the manager of our department to bring in someone new of her own choosing. That marked the beginning of the end of my time at DBS. It also marked the beginning of the end of DBS’s real independence.

Neil Liversidge is managing director of West Riding Personal Financial Solutions



Failed network Financial Ltd faces £90k in claims

Bankrupt advice network Financial Ltd is facing £90,000 in claims that are being handled by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. The company’s liquidators Moore Stephens published documents on Companies House that show two claims were made against Financial Ltd to 4 July 2016 with the FSCS listed as the contact address. The first claim is […]

FCA logo new 620x430.jpg

FCA warns on mortgage network panels and commercial deals

The FCA has raised concerns that commercial deals along the mortgage supply chain and the dominance of networks pose a risk to competition in the mortgage market. The regulator has published two reports today on whether the mortgage market is working effectively for borrowers. In the first report, the FCA says following the Mortgage Market […]

UK gilts: Shaken and stirred

Mike Riddell, fixed income portfolio manager at Allianz Global Investors, reviews the performance of the UK government bonds market post-Brexit and assesses its future prospects, as well as giving his outlook for global fixed income markets and yields movements. In addition, he provides a brief analysis of the impact of Brexit and the Bank of […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I have struggled with these concepts a lot in the last few years- the focus of networks is to worry about future liability and censure, we still have advisors determined to act as if it was 20 years ago refusing to recognise how the risk of advice has changed and then we have the customer who Haven the choice of reading a website or full-blown advice which they can’t afford or sometimes don’t want- and nothing in between. After 30 years I have seen networks evolve through many stages- this one is much more risk averse and less consumer centric- but then who can blame them with so much at stake- hopefully the treasury has given some light at the end of the tunnel.

  2. Panels are just plain wrong. Pay to play should be a criminal offence – it drives concentrated misselling. Some products should be baned but advisers advise, and when networks restrict advice to panels you get concentration risk and good products matched to the wrong client. FCA inducements ban was the best thing the FCA did in 16 years.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm