View more on these topics

When is an exit charge not an exit charge? Over to SJP…

Natalie Holt, journalist with Money Marketing Photo by Michael Walter/Troika

It is fair to say St James’s Place has come in for a bit of a kicking lately. From exit charges, to disclosure, to partner incentives, the SJP business model has been prodded and pulled around and, in some quarters, been found wanting. About time too, some advisers would say.

As David Bellamy announces he will be stepping down as chief executive at the end of this year, Money Marketing has secured an exclusive interview with the man heading up the business many advisers love to hate.

Undoubtedly, there is a lot to rile advisers in what is a wide-ranging discussion. Bellamy comments the firm does not operate exit charges (the preferred terms are “early withdrawal charge” or “deferred advice fee”), that the firm offers value, that it is rich for other advisers to criticise its charging structure. These are all claims that are likely to be met with short shrift.

He says: “I know our charges are clear to clients. I know they like the service they get, and I know performance is good, that is why we keep attracting business. That ought to be clear. Do I get frustrated [about negative press coverage]? Yes I do.”

But increasingly, there has also been some momentum behind trying to have a more balanced debate about a company that has attracted £75bn in assets over a 25-year period.

The pushback is coming from SJP clients, who do not recognise the way the company is being portrayed. Perhaps surprisingly, it is also coming from other advisers (though of course, it is hard to tell just how much of this fightback is emanating from SJP’s own partners).

Looking at the wider advice sector, Bellamy believes advice will increasingly grow in importance and eventually take centre stage for clients unable to make judgement calls on how long their wealth will last, and unable to plan accordingly.

“The pushback is coming from SJP clients, who do not recognise the way the company is being portrayed.”

He is interested in the nuances of intergenerational planning, and using financial planning to solve today’s financial problems of divorce, helping children on the property ladder and navigating a complex tax system. For Bellamy, those with wealth will always gravitate towards a face-to-face advice service over and above an algorithm.

There is a lot of the industry stuff that Bellamy touches upon that I happen to agree with, particularly his positive outlook on advice.

But I still struggle with a 6 per cent exit charge (sorry, “early withdrawal charge”) and an FCA cap of 1 per cent.

Natalie Holt is editor of Money Marketing – follow her on Twitter here

Recommended

Money-Currency-Coins-Pound-GBP-700.jpg
86

SJP performance perks to advisers under fire

The way St James’s Place pays its advisers has come under fire in the latest in a series of reports into the firm’s business dealings. A “Nectar points” style system is rewarding SJP advisers based on every additional pound of assets they generate into the firm, including with foreign trips, dinner invites and other perks, […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Eh? Is this an article or just your notes before starting to write one? You haven’t even answered your own title. Am i missing something?

  2. “Don’t find fault, find a remedy.” (Henry Ford)
    Wise words

  3. If this sector finally arrives at charging for advice and not for product/investment then models like SJP are finished
    The FCA need to act and stop the nonsense
    I have no doubt about that many SJP clients loves them they just don’t know the cost of leaving or staying!

  4. Was this just to stir some debate from those in the industry who do not understand how a vertically integrated Wealth Management firm operate and are regulated by the FCA compared to how other advice sectors operate and are regulated by the FCA?
    There seems to be a real lack of understanding from many trolls on here who come up with the same old snide comments who are either no longer qualified to give advice, or just do not understand the FCA regulations on the different sectors in the advice market. We know who the real Moonies are on here…2 legs good, 4 legs bad is it?

Leave a comment