View more on these topics

Scott Gallacher: This is the golden age of advice but poor practice lingers

Scott Gallacher

Since the introduction of the RDR we have finally started to be seen by most as professional advisers.

The insurance company salesman image may linger on for a while yet for some, but it still feels like a golden age for financial advisers and planners.

The RDR raised standards, reduced competition and started to change the public’s perception of us. At the same time, the continued bank crisis and record low deposit rates have forced people to reconsider their “cash is best” belief. Pension freedoms have suddenly, and completely unexpectedly, made pensions sexy.

These factors, coupled with the baby boomers reaching retirement age, means that, for most financial advisers I speak to, life is great and business is booming. I acknowledge the advice gap but I would suggest it is an issue for politicians and regulators rather than individual advisers.

Naturally, however, there are always some concerns. Current examples include short-term worries such as Brexit and longer-term fears about the supposed threat of robo-advice.

Brexit is primarily an investment worry, just like the Millennium Bug and leaving the European Exchange Rate Mechanism before it. It does not alter what we do or how people need us. In fact, it is probably good for advisers in the short term as it prompts a few more calls to us from people worried about the possible impact.

Robo-advice could be argued as more of an ongoing concern; however, I do not think it is really an issue for genuine financial advisers or planners. Robo-advisers at the moment are just reactive, whereas real people are time poor and want someone else to do the hard work.

Some are so reactive they do not even address the basic question of how much one should be saving or investing to achieve a good retirement, instead relying on the client to tell them how much they want to save.

Despite this being a golden age, however, there is no room for complacency: some advisers still need to raise the quality of their advice. At this point, I would urge readers to put down their pitchforks, since, if you are taking the time to read this, you are likely one of the good guys.

I probably have a slightly jaundiced view of other advisers’ work as I generally only see examples when clients are dissatisfied with their existing adviser and are looking to switch. No doubt those clients receiving excellent advice are generally happy, hence we rarely see examples of others’ great work.

But the work we do see from others is too often fundamentally flawed.

This varies from highly questionable investments at one end, to a complete lack of even basic tax planning such as Isas and capital gains tax planning. Unfortunately, I do not think higher qualifications on their own will address this issue, since I have seen plenty of examples of highly qualified advisers giving poor advice.

That said, on the whole we are a great force for good and have a great future. We just need to continue upping our game.

Scott Gallacher is director of Rowley Turton 

Recommended

Cinema-Reel-Movie-Film-Projector-700.jpg
6

Advisers found guilty in £100m film tax scam

Two advisers have been found guilty of tax fraud in a £100m film industry scam that attracted investors including footballers, investment bankers and a pop star. London-based advisers Robert Bevan and Anthony Charles Savill, and accountant Keith Hayley set up a company called Little Wing Films to develop film projects. Little Wing said that for […]

FSCS-Piggy-Bank-Alt-500x320.jpg
9

Advisers challenge FCA rejection of FSCS product levy

Advisers have been left disappointed after product-based levy has been ruled out as a potential funding model for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. The FCA held its first roundtable meeting about the FSCS funding model last week after the Financial Advice Market Review kickstarted a review into the scheme. The review is expected to consider […]

FCA logo glass 2 620x430
9

FCA rejects approval for Connaught advice firm facing £1m in claims

The FCA has refused an authorisation application from the directors behind a firm facing over £1m in claims over advice to invest in the collapsed Connaught Income funds. The regulator says Strabens Hall is facing “inevitable insolvency” due to anticipated liabilities of £1.05m to eight of its customers who complained to the Financial Ombudsman Service […]

HMRC helping to remove artificial gains

An investment bond offers investors certain tax advantages, one of which is the ability to take partial surrenders from the investment. This facility allows the policyholder to withdraw amounts up to 5% of the amount invested each policy year on a tax deferred basis, without incurring any immediate tax liability. This tax deferred allowance can […]

Frexit & contagion risk in Europe

Rob Burnett, Head of European equities at Neptune Many commentators have suggested that the UK’s exit from the European Union will trigger a domino effect, leading to its eventual break-up. Is this likely and what is the mechanism for this to happen, asks Rob Burnett, Manager of the Neptune European Opportunities Fund. Read more: https://www.realworldinvestors.com/Posts/Read/1371/Frexit_and_contagion_risk_in_Europe […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. And also don’t forget high charges – sometimes coupled with poor advice. iI some of the posts on this site are accurate then step forward SJP.

  2. Martin Campbell 6th June 2016 at 5:16 pm

    The Golden Age of Advice? Seriously?! This is a deluded assertion. OK, the worst atrocities of commission-driven selling are over, but replaced with what? The only people most IFAs want to serve now are the very wealthy who have such large amounts of money that the 1%-2% p.a. plus fees (for getting a minion to plug the client’s money into one of a dozen – if you’re lucky – model portfolios) earns as much as the commissions used to. The rest of the public are stranded and so far poorly served. This will change. But it won’t be IFAs who rescue anybody – other than perhaps a few that reduce fees, still only to the v wealthy, to a justifiable level. Like bankers, too many of you believe the public has forgiven you for your sector’s not-so-long-ago past. They haven’t. A tiny but growing minority of the industry, making increasingly good use of the internet and technology to help people to help themselves is where the best hope lies.

  3. @martincampbell I would recommend that you shop around if that’s the type of experience you you have of IFAs. Despite not being ‘cool’, we don’t have a model portfolio in sight and we sure as hell don’t charge anywhere nearing 1-2% p/a plus fees!

    I can also assert that we have more enquiries from potential clients than has historically been the case and therefore whilst ‘golden age’ may be over doing it a little (PI issues and and broader regulatory matters remain) we’re busy helping people who don’t want to spend the time themselves or perhaps invest time in gaining an understanding of (what can be) the complicated world of pension/investment/tax planning and legislation.

Leave a comment