View more on these topics

ABI: We cannot miss this opportunity to close the protection gap

The Government’s Financial Advice Market Review is looking at all aspects of financial advice to identify gaps before setting out recommendations by Budget 2016.

While the review focuses on investments, savings and retirement products, other areas should also be considered as part of its scope: in particular, protection, given the low levels of cover for too many individuals and families.

For instance, take-up of income protection in the UK remains low by international standards at around 11 per cent and a recent survey by the Money Advice Service found almost half of working age couples and families do not have life cover.

But the risks of not having cover are clear. Research by the Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion, commissioned by the ABI, found that 10.6m households – more than 60 per cent of working families – would see their income fall by more than a third if the main earner had to stop work because of ill health.

With this in mind, closing the protection gap should be a priority for the Government. At a time of severe fiscal pressures, increased take-up of protection insurance products could bring much needed help to the Exchequer in reduced expenditure on benefits, higher tax revenue and improved productivity.

The FAMR recommendations must therefore consider how advice and guidance can be improved to help consumers understand the benefits of protection. At the  Finance and Technology Research Centre’s recent Protection Forum on FAMR it was agreed that, while there is not the same need for regulatory changes to protection advice as in the investment space, there are still issues the review could address.

Clearer and simpler regulation of advice is one aspect of it. But this must be supplemented by an effort from stakeholders to improve public knowledge about lack of financial protection. Without improved demand for advice it is simply not feasible we will see an increase in the take-up of protection insurance.

The industry is leading the way here, such as through our work with MAS and the Seven Families initiative. The Government and employers can also contribute. As part of its FAMR submission the ABI is calling for the Government and employers to develop a workplace Protection Statement.

This would allow people to check their combined income from the state and their employer in the event they could not work owing to illness or injury. This statement could be communicated as part of a person’s P60 or digital tax account and would give a much clearer and more accurate picture of the financial support actually available to them.

Consumers need to be made aware of their options with relevant information and advice to ensure they are supported if they are unable to work.

Joe Ahern is policy adviser for protection at the Association of British Insurers

Recommended

FCA interior logo 620x430
7

FCA: Providers failing on retirement risk warnings

Providers are failing to provide effective risk warnings to savers looking to access their pensions, the FCA says. In its October report into pensions guidance and advice, the Work and Pensions committee advised the FCA to strengthen rules around signposting and risk warnings. And now the regulator has admitted concerns with the quality of risk […]

China-Hong-Kong-Asia-700x450.jpg

China markets shut after 870 seconds of trading

Trading on the Chinese stock markets was halted for the second time this week, after just 870 seconds of trading. The circuit-breakers introduced in the New Year were triggered again today after the market fell more than 5 per cent, starting a 15 minute halt to trading. However, when trading resumed markets fell by another […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Perhaps if it was more affordable people would buy it. For most people. it would prove to be enormously expensive and so is not purchased. I do wonder whether in countries where the take up is higher it is cheaper in relation to people’s overall income.

    And of course people need to know it exists in the first place.

Leave a comment