View more on these topics

Advisers neglect existing clients at their peril

Emma Thomson

Loyalty is something to be treasured and rewarded, and I think the protection industry could hugely profit by demonstrating lots of it.

There is no hiding from the fact that a significant number of consumers have no protection in place, so new business is vital. But looking after existing clients well is the right thing to do too. It is wasteful to attract new clients through the front door while at the same time letting existing ones wander out the back.

We might not be the most innovative of industries but there are regular improvements to products, especially critical illness cover. That is to be welcomed to help more people claim. However, product enhancements rarely benefit existing plan holders.

There are a few exceptions (British Friendly being one to recently offer an improvement to existing clients) but this is far from the norm. What’s more, somewhat ironically, given that insurers hate the idea, it forces client-focused intermediaries and informed clients to re-broke in order to benefit from the improvements, as we get situations where clients who took out protection a few years ago cannot claim for something a newer customer could.

This only leads to consumer distrust and negative press stories. There are pricing and reinsurance arguments to factor in but there should be more effort to look at how these enhancements can be offered to existing policyholders too.

Systems, processes and call management are also not as good for existing clients. It is often faster to submit a new application online than utilise a guaranteed insurability option where there is supposed to be no underwriting. Madness.

But the effort is worth it. Through our own approach to look after existing clients (whether that be to help with failed direct debits, discuss market improvements or ask if circumstances have changed) an unexpected consequence is that we are identifying those who could have claimed but had not, either because they had forgotten about the policy, could not remember exactly what it covered or did not know their partner/parent even had it. One in nine of all the claimants we have supported since Q3 last year would not have known they could claim had it not been for our call to them.

In insurance, serving clients fairly always costs more than being unfair but we have all moved way past being blocked by that actuarial approach. So why not introduce better technology to help intermediaries service policies in force, regularly reminding clients what cover they have and, importantly, the value of it? And why not design flexible products where, for example, clients who bought life cover alone six month ago can easily add on some critical illness cover and income protection without being fully underwritten again. Vitality recognises loyalty through discounts and rewards, and more of this approach would be welcomed too.

We all need to support our existing clients better. After all, getting it right will help more people claim, which is surely the best reason there is to do it.

Emma Thomson 
is life office relationship director at Lifesearch

Recommended

How the protection industry can overcome the apathy barrier

Forewarned is forearmed, as the saying goes. But getting consumers to understand the potential consequences of not having protection is an uphill struggle. Research from the protection industry is bursting with evidence of lack of awareness, apathy and misconceptions that act as barriers to buying products. But given we are in the age of digital […]

Michael-Aldridge-700.jpg

Mike Aldridge: The extras that make protection cover pay

Most consumers today are as taken with the extras they can get with a purchase as they are with the main purchase itself: from free robots and toys when you buy from certain home insurance companies, to store points accrued to provide rewards when you reach certain thresholds. Protection policies also come with “extras” but […]

How can I help develop my professional connections?

Graeme Ballantyne, business consultancy manager, looks at how you can maximise the opportunities through your professional connections As we move through the summer months it’s perhaps a good time to pause and reflect on whether the plans you’ve made for your business are bearing fruit. One area we at PruConsulting know many advisers have been […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. If life changes occur on average every 5years, reviews of protection need to be every 3 in order to plan. Review protection needs 3yearly as a result and charge a retainer for the ongoing advice and 3yearly reviews. Investment advisers do it with fees for managing investment portfolios and managing/protecting the famillies money making machine and servicimg it regularly are essential with a car, why not with a human?

  2. Sooooo…re-broking then… We are all for changing / Helping / TCF, and changing when there is a need. It’s amazing how many companies abuse the system, and have teams that ”re-visit” not mentioning any specifically here…

    Maybe the Insurance companies will see this differently.. maybe they won’t..

Leave a comment