View more on these topics

Family feuds and the impact on trustee choice

Cutout-Griffin-Rachael-Old-Mutual-Wealth-2014

All too often, disruption and fighting can be an unhappy by-product of the process of dividing up the estate of a deceased relative. This can cause significant extra stress for family members at an already difficult time.

High profile disputes have been common in recent months, with the financial legacy of a number of public figures being contested in public. For example, the family of TV personality Lynda Bellingham, who passed away in 2015, have been subject to a media frenzy recently after widower Michael Pattemore reportedly spent over half a million pounds on a new home, having allegedly evicted his stepsons from his late wife’s previous marriage.

While we do not know the full details of the case, it serves as a timely reminder of the advantages of appointing independent professional trustees to ensure all beneficiaries’ needs are considered, while minimising any potential conflict.

Trust law

Indeed, the benefits of a trust are much wider than tax mitigation alone. Although trust arrangements are a valuable planning tool that can help mitigate inheritance tax liability, an often-overlooked benefit is that they provide significant control over how assets are distributed on death.

This control can be achieved in part through a discretionary trust, which hands trustees discretion over how best to divide assets among beneficiaries. By putting in place a letter of wishes, settlors are able to provide guidance and some direction to the trustees, indicating how they would prefer the assets to be distributed.

Trustees can normally be expected to follow the guidance set out in an expression of wishes, although, ultimately, this is not binding and in some circumstances the trustees may be able to justify decisions the settlor may not have approved of.

This discretion can pose problems after the death of the settlor, particularly where close friends and family members have been appointed trustees. Often one or more of the trustees are also beneficiaries, presenting an obvious risk of a conflict of interest.

Trust law also places a duty on trustees to review investments and take proper advice over the management of the trust: for example, by seeking tax advice on the impact the distribution of assets may have on beneficiaries.

Furthermore, the trustees also have a duty to treat all beneficiaries of the trust fairly. For instance, some beneficiaries may prefer lower-risk investments designed to preserve capital, while others may favour longer-term growth assets. It is the duty of the trustees to consider the interest of all beneficiaries and balance their interests proportionately when making decisions.

When establishing a trust, it is also possible to put in place a “protector”. In effect, an individual appointed as protector has final say should their fellow trustees fail to reach an agreement on a particular decision. This can alleviate stalemate situations if the trust requires consensus among all trustees (or a majority decision); however, it places additional pressure on the protector.

Responsibilities for trustees

These responsibilities create a number of challenges and potential pitfalls for trustees to overcome. Nonetheless, when choosing a trustee, many people default to family members and friends, feeling confident those individuals will be able to act impartially to exact their wishes. This might seem like an obvious choice but the reality of the responsibilities of trusteeship should not be taken lightly.

Whereas a friend or family member might struggle with the complexities of trust and tax law (especially if the trust is subject to a different jurisdictional legal system), clients with a professional trustee can rest assured the trust provisions and regulations are not being breached.

A professional trustee also removes the moral and personal burdens of providing objective decisions, which may weigh heavily on a friend or family member. Additionally, without the possibility of personal complications, a client can be confident his stated wishes will be fully taken into account.

Although not specifically a trust issue, the dispute involving Bellingham’s widower provides a good example of the potential for conflict to arise where it is argued assets have been distributed unfairly.

It is even possible beneficiaries may seek to sue trustees through the courts if they believe they have failed in their duties. Lay trustees should be aware of this worst-case scenario before taking up trusteeship.

Professional trustees will not be suitable for everyone but clients should give careful consideration to the pitfalls of appointing a lay trustee before asking a friend or family member to oversee the distribution of their financial legacy.

 Rachael Griffin is financial planning expert at Old Mutual Wealth

Recommended

Thousands expected to be hit by HMRC pension death tax error

Thousands of people are likely to have been sent notices asking for tax to be paid after they have inherited a pension, despite no tax being due. Last week Money Marketing revealed HM Revenue & Customs sent the notices after a system error and has had to ask providers to suspend reporting while it works […]

1

Mike Morrison: The Lifetime Isa’s inheritance tax nightmare

Despite repeated public claims from Government officials that pensions are here to stay, it is clear to anyone in the industry that the direction of travel is towards Isas as the primary long term savings vehicle. New products are being created, allowances are being increased and the mantra is ‘pensions are complicated, Isas are simple’. […]

2017 and the savings landscape…

Anyone who is involved in the world of workplace savings will recognise that the last few months have been rather interesting to say the least. At the start of the year both employers and the pensions industry were braced for major changes to UK pension tax reliefs in the March Budget. Yet shortly before the […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Sascha Klauß 18th May 2016 at 9:21 am

    This is the first I’ve heard of the Lynda Bellingham case, but as I understand it the mother cut her sons out of the Will and left everything to their stepfather (who won’t give them a penny). So it’s about whether she was of sound mind when she made her Will and whether the Will is valid, nothing to do with trusts. Not sure why the article brings it up.

  2. Rachael Griffin 31st May 2016 at 9:00 am

    Thanks for the comment. I mentioned the Lynda Bellingham case, purely to illustrate that if the intention was for the sons to benefit – then planning during your lifetime, through the use of trusts – may avoid post-death feuds.

Leave a comment