# Tony Wickenden: Crunching the numbers on salary, dividend or pension

This week I am going to continue my detailed look at the salary versus dividend versus pension conundrum I started before the summer break. When considering the available options there is no real substitute for number crunching once the principles are understood. What follows are some examples applying the principles I discussed in the past couple of articles on this most important subject.

Example one shows a one-person company wanting to keep income within the basic rate band, with no employment allowance available.

Table 1.1 shows the dividend benefits from both the £5,000 dividend allowance and the £2,940 of unused personal allowance. Suffering 20 per cent corporation tax on the dividend is better than the position for salary that bears no income tax, but 25.8 per cent employer/employee National Insurance contributions, of which only the employer’s is tax-relieved. The extra net income comes with a greater slice of the profit. If the gross profit is kept the same for salary and dividend, table 1.2 is applicable.

Example two shows a one-person and single other employee company wanting to keep income within the basic rate band, with at least £2,888 of income covered by employment allowance.

The bottom line in table 2.1 is £352.80 less than in table 1.1 but the gross profit cost is £735 lower because an extra £2,940 has been extracted as employee NIC-able salary rather than dividend, thereby avoiding any corporation tax charge. If we repeat the calculation with the same gross profit as the salary only option, the results in table 2.2 are applicable.

Example three shows a one-person company wanting to keep income under £50,000 child benefit tax charge level, with no employment allowance available.

Again, the dividend route absorbs more (£4,704.46) gross profit, which boosts the resulting net income (by £9,232.80). If at least £2,888 of income is covered by the employment allowance then, as in table 2.1, there would be a cut of £735 in the gross profit cost for the salary and dividend option, and a corresponding reduction in net benefit of £352.80 due to employee’s NICs. I will look at a few more important examples next week.

Tony Wickenden is joint managing director of Technical Connection. You can find him Tweeting @tecconn

1

## Tony Wickenden: Unpicking the salary v dividend debate

In last week’s article I looked at some of the fundamentals behind making the decision as to how to withdraw funds from a company for owners/managers. Following on, table one shows that if we look at the situation above the upper earnings limit/higher rate threshold, the advantage of dividends remains but is reduced, as was […]

5

## Martin Tilley: Exploit salary sacrifice before Govt clampdown

Last year’s summer Budget raised a warning in respect of the use of salary sacrifice in exchange for additional pension provision. It stated: “Salary sacrifice arrangements can allow some employees and employers to reduce the income tax and National Insurance they pay on remuneration. They are becoming increasingly popular and the cost to the taxpayer […]

21

## Andrew Tully: Breaking the taboo on final salary pension transfers

Transferring out of a final salary pension scheme has long been seen as a taboo by many in the industry. But the issue has been thrown into much greater focus since the pension freedoms were introduced. This is partly because many schemes are offering transfer values higher than the historical average but also as a […]

## Artemis High Income: Crunches vs wobbles

Alex Ralph, manager of the Artemis High Income Fund, talks about high-yield bonds in the US and Europe – and why she favours the latter.

## Artemis European Growth Fund: “Cheap and churning out growth”

Macroeconomic matters are less significant for stockpickers, says fund manager Philip Wolstencroft. The companies in his portfolio are growing reliably and stand at a 20 per cent discount to the market.

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox