View more on these topics

Is the price right for stakeholder?

The arrival of stakeholder over two years ago created a new low-cost benchmark for the industry but some providers have found it difficult to adapt to its charging structure.

Where providers have collected all their charges up front, it has been relatively easy to say that plans will remain stakeholder-compliant in the future.

For others which have given extra allocations at the beginning of the contract, the situation is not so easy.

Friends Provident, Scottish Equitable, Skandia and Axa cannot say whether their pension products are all on stakeholder terms.

Axa spokesman Steve Muir says: “Our view is that if people are in a position to keep contributing into a plan, how can we make it so they are no worse off staying with us? We have not changed our charging structures but, for incremental business, instead of 100 per cent allocation, we are giving 105.5 per cent allocation, which broadly equates to a 1 per cent reduction in yield although some contracts may be marginally higher.”

Scottish Equitable is one of the providers that did not switch clients over en masse to stakeholder terms. Spokeswoman Margaret Robertson says: “It is very difficult to compare apples and oranges. Because we gave higher allocations of units at the beginning, we could not move contracts across in a blanket fashion.”

Norwich Union gave a guarantee on its funds that it would not charge more than 1 per cent a year although switching penalties remain.

Standard Life also made a blanket offer of stakeholder terms, as did Legal & General, which switched all its contracts on to stakeholder terms with a guarantee on top that individuals would not be worse off under the new contracts.

Scottish Widows repriced its individual and group pensions with 100 per cent allocation and a maximum 1 per cent annual management charge from June 2001. Clerical Medical has also repriced.

Life offices are unable simply to wipe away the commission paid at the time the product was sold, so continue to charge penalties for switching to other providers.

L&G pension marketing director Andy Agar says: “This is where the IFA has a huge role to play. It may be that despite the penalty of getting out of a fund, it is still worth it if you are going to get a lower charge through the remainder of the life of the policy.”

Scottish Life has not moved clients on to stakeholder terms and says it is the responsibility of the adviser to evaluate whether it is in the interest of clients to stay in the contract or add further payments. Factors affecting this decision include the specific nature of the contract, the client&#39s intentions on how long they will contribute to the product and the IFA&#39s approach to commission.

Scottish Life group head of communications Alasdair Buchanan says: “With our existing book, we provided IFAs with information to let them know whether it was worth moving clients on to stakeholder terms. In the vast majority of cases, it was not, because the existing structure meant charges had been levied up front.”

Richard Jacobs Pension & Trustee Services director Richard Jacobs says Prudential has been ruthless in its pricing, particularly cutting back on commission on pension contracts, which may be an advantage because it makes it a stronger life office. He says: “Pru is being utterly ruthless in the way it does business but if that means it will be the company that is around in 10 years time, then you have to ask why Standard Life is being so generous.”

Some would argue that providers are repricing where they can, where it is easy and where it makes good business sense to do so.

Buchanan says: “It is not as simple as saying some companies have been nice and repriced while others have been nasty and have not. Some companies tried to position their repricing as being customer-friendly but the reality is it was in their financial interest to do so. Then you get the companies that have repriced some products but not others. This demonstrates that they have only done it where there is an economic argument to do so.”

Skandia will not waive charges for clients wanting to change to new contracts. Pensions brand manager Billy Mackay says: “Our stance has always been that it is down to the IFA to decide whether it is worth transferring to a new product.”

Mackay believes the policy of switching clients to stakeholder could come back to haunt providers or the advisers who placed the business. He says the way some providers&#39 documents describe the annual charge as 1 per cent while others express the charge as the Government&#39s stakeholder cap could cause problems if the cap is raised in the future, as life offices hope.

He says: “If the cap goes up, the life offices will have two choices. They may hold their existing book on 1 per cent, which will leave the IFA with no problem but leave the provider still writing business on a 12 to 15-year profit horizon. But if they turn round and say the stakeholder cap has changed so the charge is going up, IFAs who have described a reduction in yield of 1 per cent in their reasons why letter will have to revisit the client.”

Competition on prices means IFAs are in a position where they have to keep an eye on clients&#39 contracts and switch them over if the maths say they should, even if they could be accused of churning.

Anyone concerned on that score should remember the FSA itself issued a paper last year entitled, To Switch or Not to Switch. So, if it is OK for the FSA…


New addition to PPML marketing team

Third party pensions administrator Personal Pension Management has appointed Helen Webb to its marketing team as marketing promotions manager.Webb is formerly product manager of life and pensions at Barclays and will now be responsible for a range of general marketing activities and promoting PPML and its services to its business partners. She will report to […]

The gilt complex

In my last article, I started to look at the importance, for advisers and their clients, of identifying asset allocation within with-profits funds to help estimate likely future sustainable rates of bonus. I looked specifically at the important example of Equitable Life, whose with-profits fund, at least until recently, consisted of around 80 per cent […]

Clerical Medical buys in bulk

Clerical Medical has brought out a S32 bulk buy-out plan to take advantage of opportunities within the pension transfer market as a result of the trend for the winding up of final salary schemes. Clerical Medical says final salary scheme wind-ups are being driven by factors such as restructuring within companies, mergers and takeovers, management […]

Pru appoints yet another sales director

The Prudential has taken on its third new sales director in the last two years with Axa&#39s Chris Traynor picking up the reins as intermediary sales director. Due to start in October, Traynor had been with Axa, and Sun Life premerger, for 20 years, holding various sales and sales management roles within IFA distribution. He […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm