View more on these topics

Is Kenmir hero or villain?

So, the acceptable face of the FSA, David Kenmir, has become the unacceptable face in record time – at least among advisers.

The managing director was highly rated by the industry for his relatively smooth handling of the PI nightmare which probably stopped some firms going to the wall and allowed others to manage a transition to a network or support services company, where PI could be maintained more easily.

But Kenmir has fallen dramatically in the popularity stakes with his warnings about IFAs being fined or losing their licences to trade. So, what is he – hero or villain?

The answer is probably not all that straightforward. In his defence, Kenmir did warn at Money Marketing Live in May that IFAs were taking too much money out of their businesses, leaving them exposed to unexpec-ted financial stresses.

His list included threats of VAT rises, PI costs and regulatory fees for the compensation scheme exacerbated by phoenixing firms. But in the last two weeks, he has not handled the fees issue well. First, a distinction should have been made between three groups – advisers seemingly unwilling to pay, those paying by direct debit, although presumably about to get a massive shock to their business accounts, and those which cannot pay. The remarks – no doubt intended to get advisers to pay up quickly – smacked of scare tactics.

The dual threats should not have been made without at least some suggestion of compromise. The FSA should show some flexibility and allow fees to be paid in instalments. This may seem unfair to those firms which have paid but surely that unfairness is more acceptable than forcing many firms out of business.

Part of the reason the FSA may have got it so wrong is that it believes the fee issue is not really its problem and that it is one for the compensation scheme. Canary Wharf, in this case, is a glorified debt collector.

Kenmir is one of the smartest, sharpest and approachable people in the regulator but debt collection is not in his skill set and while he may be approachable, he is still a regulator – a member of a tough organisation which has always strained the princ-iple of fairness because the interests of the consumer have to be put first, even at the risk of consumers abusing their right to complain.

The other accusation that IFAs can legitimately level at the regulator and the Treasury is that the increa-ses in PI cover demanded by the European Union are partly their fault. This was not a failure of IFAs to plan effectively but arguably a failure by Government bodies, including the FSA, to get their point across which meant a strained PI market became even more and pro-bably unnecessarily expen-sive. IFAs which struggled but just managed to meet their PI expenses may find fees to be the final straw.

Of course, calling Kenmir names will not solve anything. In this instance, he has been unfair but it is not too late – he should allow payment by instalments.

The product providers must also shoulder some responsibility. Money Marketing will be questioning them in the next few weeks as they have been caught off guard by the scale of the increases and the impact of capping the subsidy.

In reality, when the PIA&#39s regulatory requirement to have a cross-subsidy was removed, the subsidy was immediately in jeopardy. But it was one of those rule changes where the effect has been underestimated. Making noises about distribution businesses having to stand on their own two feet is all very well but the bear market has meant several of the biggest insurers facing technical insolvency. IFAs, for their part, have not been afforded a lot of slack.

Those close to this pro-cess tell us that providers are surprised about the reaction to the end of the subsidy but its expected disappearance next year means they are behaving as if polarisation is already a thing of the past. They should realise that the transition period has ended too early and extend the subsidy, otherwise their distribution is going to suffer again.

For the providers to walk away from the sort of joint responsibility they have accepted in the past seems unfair, too. At least they should strongly consider keeping cross-subsidy res-ponsibility for the pre-depolarisation sales.

Finally, the regulator, providers and IFAs should be working together to ensure that failing and phoenixing firms do not bring down other better-run and more ethical advice practices. That would be the greatest unfairness of all.


Marlboro&#39 focuses on outsourcing

Turnover dropped to £49.8m from £56m in the same period in 2003. Profits were down to £1.7m from £2.6m. The company says its main area of focus will be the huge market potential for life and pension outsourcing. It will also continue to develop functionality and business connections for The Exchange. Marketing director Steve Butcher […]

Select & Protect receives its MTA letter

Select & Protect receives its MTA letter from the FSA. Select chief executive Simon Hood says: “We will shortly be announcing details of our regulated offering for brokers and advisers who are to be directly authorised by the FSA. This will include enhanced commissions, full compliance support, competitively rated range of products and a comprehensive […]

FSA aiming for further cut in enforcement case times

FSA chief executive John Tiner is warning that IFAs could be hit by enforcement proceedings faster if the regulator succeeds in its plans to reduce case times. The FSA is aiming for a further 30 per cent reduction in the average case time over the next 12 months. In the last two years, the regulator […]

Whole-of-life shock for watchdog

The Financial Ombudsman has seen a sudden rise in complaints where whole-of-life insurance products were sold without clients being told that policies would be reviewed. The ombudsman claims that trends of complaints by consumers about whole of life policies have changed. The FOS was previously getting complaints about policies that were sold without regard for […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm