View more on these topics

Investors Capital trust renamed to F&C UK High Income trust

stock-stockmarket-ftse-index700x450The £140m Investors Capital trust has changed its name to F&C UK High Income trust.

Iain McLaren, the trust’s chairman, says the renaming of the fund “more clearly reflects the investment aims of the company”.

The move, which will not bring any changes to the investment objectives of the fund, has immediate effect and won’t affect shareholders.

The firm’s net asset value total return per share was 84.6 per cent since its launch in 2007 to the end of January and outperformed returns from the FTSE All-Share Capped 5% index of 77.8 per cent over the same period, according to Lipper.

However, the trust lagged its sector, the UK Equity & Bond Income, over the last five years returning 62.4 per cent versus the sector’s 99.1 per cent, according to FE.

Meanwhile, as of 27 January, the yield on the company’s A shares and B shares was 4.8 per cent and 4.7 per cent respectively, compared to the 3.7 per cent yield on the index. The yield on the unit price at the same date was 4.8 per cent, the firm says.

The trust has ongoing charges of 1.06 per cent.


The Royal Bank Of Scotland – The Nasdaq Guaranteed Return Bond – Issue II

Thursday, 11th January 2001.Type: Guaranteed offshore bond.Aim: Growth linked to the Nasdaq-100 index.Minimum investment: £5,000 or $10,000.Place of registration: Jersey.Investment split: 100 per cent linked to the Nasdaq-100 index.Guarantee: Capital plus 10 per cent returned at end of term even if index falls below starting level.Yield: Quarterly rise in index averaged over the term, subject […]

Storm warning

Douglas McPhail, investment manager, fixed income at Swip, says problems are brewing with a basic liquidity mismatch between banks and money market funds


Peter Hamilton: The dangers of out-of-depth advisers

This time last year, I wrote about a High Court case in which the judge had rejected an application by Zurich Assurance Limited and Zurich Advice Network Limited (Zurich) to strike out a 96-year-old client’s claim for failing to advise her properly. Since then, the judge upheld the claim and has awarded the claimant damages […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment